Compliance with Pipa for trustees

Published: 25 Apr 2025
Type: Insight

The Personal Information Protection Act 2016, the island’s data protection legislation, applies to all organisations that use personal information in Bermuda.

These three terms — organisations, use and personal information — are defined in the Act.

In the context of trust structures, “organisations” may include individual trustees, private trust companies, regulated local trust companies, underlying holding companies and protectors.

Navigating how each organisation must comply with Pipa in connection with any trust can be daunting.

For example, are individual trustees of the same trust, or a trustee and a protector of the same trust, more than one “organisation” for the purposes of Pipa, given that trusts do not have legal personality and “organisation” is not defined to include either a trust or a collection of individuals (or individuals and entities) with a common purpose?

This matters because obligations under Pipa fall on organisations — each of which must, for example, have a privacy officer, though a common privacy officer may be used where more than one organisation is under common ownership or control, which may be helpful here.

An important point to note about Pipa is that it is not possible to “contract out” of it, ie, for trustees to ask individuals about whom personal information may be held to waive their Pipa rights. Trustees may wish to consider whether any trust terms limiting disclosure to beneficiaries are inconsistent with Pipa.

Compliance with Pipa for trustees will typically involve, among other things:

  • appointing a privacy officer/considering whether someone from a service provider can be nominated for this role
  • formulating Pipa policies and procedures and considering the collection and use of personal information — generally, privacy notices should be sent out, and consent may be needed to use personal information. Care should be taken when seeking consent — for example, the guidance from the Privacy Commissioner states that “it is good practice to avoid making consent to processing a precondition of service”. If a person refuses consent to processing in circumstances where the trust could not operate without processing personal information, special consideration will be needed as to the best way to proceed. One may also wish to consider whether the “personal and domestic exemption” can ever apply in the family trusts context
  • considering the integrity and retention of personal information, ie, making sure information held is accurate and not kept for longer than can be justified, which may be a tricky call
  • considering requests for disclosure, rectification, blocking, erasure and destruction of information pursuant to Pipa. The interaction of disclosure rights under Pipa with the quite limited disclosure rights under general trust law principles (as enshrined in the Privy Council decision in Schmidt v Rosewood) is interesting. Navigating the exceptions to the right of access under Pipa may require advice, for example, where legal privilege might apply (though it may not be possible to plead this against beneficiaries) and where the disclosure of the personal information requested under Pipa would reveal personal information about another individual
  • ensuring robust data security measures are in place
  • considering contracts with service providers in terms of their responsibilities in relation to personal information, especially if they are an “overseas third party” subject to special provisions under Pipa. Going forward, all contracts entered into by trustees should be drafted with Pipa in mind; if it is possible to seek advice without transferring information that relates to identifiable individuals, that may be preferable
  • taking special care of sensitive personal information, such as information on family life or health
  • taking appropriate action in the event of security breaches — this may involve reporting to the Privacy Commissioner and affected individuals — and disclosure of breaches to insurers may also be needed. Indeed, trustees should ensure that any liability insurance, eg, directors’ and officers’ insurance for directors of a private trust company, covers breaches of Pipa

Breach of Pipa is a serious matter, as it can be a criminal offence, so trustees must work hard to get to grips with these issues as they apply to individual trust structures.

First Published in The Royal Gazette, Legally Speaking column, April 2025

Share
More publications
ICLG Fintech 21 cover
14 Sep 2026

Navigating BMA’s proposed AI guidance note

Now that the Bermuda Monetary Authority has shifted its focus from general principles about artificial intelligence to a concrete, actionable regulatory framework, board and executive teams of financial service companies must take note and decide whether to become involved in the consultative process.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
10 Sep 2026

AI in the Workplace: Emerging Legal Issues for Bermuda Employers

Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming part of the modern workplace. It has moved quickly from being an experimental technology to an everyday business tool. Employers are already using AI to draft job advertisements, screen applications, assess candidates, analyse employee performance, monitor productivity and assist with disciplinary and termination decisions. For employers, the attraction is obvious. AI can process large quantities of information quickly, identify patterns and perform tasks that previously required significant human resources. But such widespread application of AI is also giving rise to legal risk as regulators and courts around the world consider what happens when an employment decision is made, or materially influenced, by an algorithm. It is a question that is likely to become increasingly relevant in Bermuda, as the law necessarily catches up with the technology.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 Sep 2026

Capital rich, softening rates, big opportunity: the growth dilemma

After several years of healthy profits, despite some softening, the reinsurance market remains in good shape – if discipline remains. Meanwhile, new and complex risks are emerging, including data centres, offering big opportunities for growth for those willing to take it on. They were some of the takeaways from 10 senior executives from the Bermuda market who met at a roundtable in Monte Carlo.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 Sep 2026

A refusal to stand still

Anchored by regulatory credibility and an unmatched marketplace, Bermuda continues to widen its offering with capital adaptability and innovation, says Brad Adderley, of Appleby.

Appleby-Website-Funds-and-Investment-Services
27 Aug 2026

Late-stage liquidity and the Bermuda fund toolkit

Private-market liquidity once followed an exit. Today, however, it must often be engineered. That matters in Bermuda, where asset management is not only a substantial sector in its own right, but also complemented by Bermuda’s re/insurance and insurance-linked securities market.

Corporate
13 Aug 2026

The limited liability company: ten years on

Nearly a decade after they were first introduced in Bermuda, parties have started to appreciate the benefits offered by limited liability companies — and consequently we have begun to see LLCs used with increasing frequency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
11 Aug 2026

MGAs, capacity and control

Max Tetlow and Cathryn Minors of Appleby examine the forces pushing MGAs toward better alignment and more disciplined capital.

Technology and Innovation
28 Jul 2026

Bermuda’s digital asset foresight bearing fruit

The wisdom of Bermuda’s pioneering approach in the digital asset business space has been underlined by the latest global economic impact figures compiled by McKinsey & Company, the global management consulting firm.

050-Insolvency-Restructuring-Grid-Image
13 Jul 2026

Bermuda: Restructuring & Insolvency

This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of Restructuring & Insolvency laws and regulations applicable in Bermuda.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
10 Jul 2026

It’s healthy to sometimes disagree with regulators

At some point, almost every regulated business will disagree with its regulator.