Landlords be aware of rent control pitfalls

Published: 23 Nov 2017
Type: Insight

Landlords considering the purchase or letting of investment accommodation should, as part of their due diligence process, consider if the property is rent-controlled.


Numerous Bermuda properties have been subject to rent control for many years. Currently, residential accommodation with an annual rental value (“ARV”) of $22,800, or less, falls under rent control.

The main exceptions to rent control are:

  • accommodation with an ARV over $22,800;
  • employer-owned accommodation, provided under an employment contract;
  • licenced tourist accommodation;
  • accommodation normally occupied by a landlord, who is away from Bermuda, for less than 12 months;
  • boarding or lodging house accommodation; or
  • if the tenant is what is known as a “life tenant”.

Over time, with ARV revaluations and changing rent control thresholds, accommodation can easily fall into and out of rent control. Prior to 1 January 2016, the ARV threshold for rent control was set at $27,000 or less. On that date, the ARV threshold for rent control was lowered to the current level of $22,800. Consequently, additional accommodation escaped rent control from that day forward.

In particular, beware rent set by a previous landlord in breach of rent control. A past breach, even without the knowledge of a current landlord, may subject a current landlord to financial liabilities.

Rent control legislation not only restricts rent, but also provides security of tenure to rent-controlled tenants. This means a court order is required to evict a rent-controlled tenant; but take care as other kinds of tenant also require a court order, before eviction.

Additionally a deposit paid by a tenant, with respect to rent-controlled accommodation, should not exceed the higher of $100.00, or the equivalent of two weeks’ rent.

Contact the Rent Commissioner’s office by telephone or email, to ask if accommodation is, or has ever been rent-controlled.

Even if otherwise falling under rent control, accommodation not previously let (e.g. a newly-constructed unit), may first be rented at any level of rent. However, any subsequent rent increase, whether to the same or to a different tenant, is restricted.

Rent should not be higher than the rent charged to the first tenant of a rent-controlled property (even if by a previous landlord) unless:

  • the landlord and tenant have agreed an increase, following which (a) the landlord has lodged notice with the Rent Commissioner; and (b) the landlord is in possession of a copy of such notice, duly endorsed by the Rent Commissioner; or
  • the landlord has received the Rent Commissioner’s determination, approving an increase.

If a landlord applies to the Rent Commissioner for an increase, the Rent Commissioner firstly consults with the tenant. If there is no tenant, no such consultation is required. The Rent Commissioner then determines the rent.

If a landlord or a tenant is dissatisfied with a Rent Commissioner determination, either may apply for a review. The Rent Commissioner then consults the Rent Increases Advisory Panel, before final determination. After a final determination, there is a right of appeal to the Magistrates’ Court.

A prospective tenant cannot agree a rent increase to a rent-controlled property. Instead, a landlord should lodge an application for increase, with the Rent Commissioner.

Contravention of rent control can result in criminal prosecution and/or a tenant claim against the landlord, for up to two years of rent paid in excess of controlled rent (even if paid to a previous landlord of the accommodation in question). Additionally, a seller of rent-controlled property, may have to make concessions to a purchaser, if a purchaser cannot be satisfied rent control has been observed.

In summary, the status of investment accommodation should be investigated and once known and if appropriate, steps can be considered to correct, or mitigate potential disadvantage.

First published in the Royal Gazette, November 2017

Share
More publications
Bermuda-1024x576-1
1 Jul 2026

A Forest for the Future

A first since the blight, the airport cedar forest is growing tall and standing strong.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
1 Jul 2026

Complied out of business

Firms are complying themselves out of business because compliance no longer matches the evolving sophistication of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA).

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

The long game: how Bermuda became the world’s life reinsurance capital

Ask a life insurer in New York, London or Tokyo where the liabilities behind their book ultimately sit and there is an increasingly good chance the answer is a 21-square-mile island in the North Atlantic.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

Record H1’26 Cat Bond Issuance Driven by Rising Sponsor Comfort and Diversified Risk

With H1 2026 officially breaking the record for the most catastrophe bond deals to come to market and settle in the first six months of the year, a key trend driving this momentum is how comfortable sponsors have become with the mechanics of the overall cat bond space. This familiarity has ultimately encouraged a wave of new sponsors to enter the market, according to Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Jun 2026

The Cost of Getting Employee Departures Wrong: Five Common Pitfalls for Bermuda Employers

Employee departures are an inevitable part of running a business, but the way they are managed can have significant legal, financial and operational consequences. In Bermuda, employers who approach terminations without adequate preparation may expose themselves to unnecessary disputes, regulatory issues, and reputational harm. Whether an employee is being dismissed for performance reasons, made redundant or departing as part of a negotiated exit, by recognizing the following common mistakes and taking a proactive approach, organizations can manage departures more effectively and reduce risk.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
8 Jun 2026

It’s time to bridge Pipa compliance gap

A review of 200 publicly available privacy notices of companies in Bermuda has revealed that just one in nine are fully compliant with the Personal Information Protection Act 2016.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
26 May 2026

Transparency is a legal requirement under Pipa

Major companies across the European Union have faced substantial fines between 2019 and 2024, estimated at a total of €930 million (about $1.08 billion), not only for cyberattacks or data breaches, but also for issues such as noncompliant privacy notices. A common theme in many cases has been a lack of transparency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 May 2026

Outsourcing considerations for Bermuda insurers

As Bermuda insurers engage with third-party service providers to support their business functions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority has clarified its regulatory expectations surrounding outsourcing arrangements and operational resilience.

Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.