Insurance linked securities and the Bermuda fund structure

Published: 25 Jun 2018
Type: Insight

First published in HFMWeek Special Report: Bermuda 2018

The emergence of Insurance Linked Securities (ILS) has been one of the most significant developments in the (re)insurance sector during recent years and Bermuda has been at the forefront of innovation in this field. These securities are products of the convergence between the insurance and capital markets.

They may be used in addition or as an alternative to the purchase of reinsurance. More specifically, ILS structures represent alternative risk transfer instruments. They enable insurance risk to be sold in capital markets, raising funds that can be used by issuers to pay claims arising from catastrophes and other loss events. The most prominent type of ILS are catastrophe bonds which are fully collateralised debt instruments that pay off on the occurrence of defined catastrophic events. Although the ILS market is small relative to the overall (re)insurance market, it is significant when compared to the property and casualty sector of the traditional (re)insurance market.

Pension funds and retirement schemes have been leading the charge in pumping capital into ILS products in a bid to diversify their equity and stock market exposures into less volatile and non‐ correlating risks and higher yields (between 5‐7% on average), spurring demand in the ILS space. Pension funds have amassed huge capital work with a longer investment time horizon and have traditionally been active in alternative investments with increasing allocations to alternative assets. Sluggishness in exchange traded securities is increasingly driving them to seek greater returns in the face of their rapidly aging baby‐boomer beneficiaries.

The typical ILS investment fund structure centres around the following corporate limited liability vehicles, frequently in combination:

a mutual fund company authorised or exempted (Fund) under the Investment Funds Act 2006, as amended (IFA); and

an insurance company (usually a special purpose insurer (SPI)) registered under the Insurance Act 1978, as amended.

Closed‐ended funds are funds where investors hold non‐redeemable securities and funds that are (i) private (i.e. not promoting itself to the public) and (ii) have less than 20 investors. Closed‐ended funds are excluded from regulation under the IFA.

In a typical ILS transaction, the Fund would be an excluded fund, a Class A Exempt Fund or a Class B Exempt Fund. ILS structures commonly use a stand alone Fund (being an Excluded of Class A Exempt Fund) or a master/feeder structure with a combination of a Excluded master and a Class A Exempt or Class B Exempt feeder.

To qualify as a Class A Exempt Fund, a fund must:

only be open to qualified participants (which includes Institutional investors); have an investment manager who:

is licensed under the Investment Business Act 2003; or

is authorised or licensed by a foreign regulator recognised by the BMA (e.g. the Securities Exchange Commission in the United States); or

is carrying on business in or from Bermuda or a jurisdiction recognised by the BMA and who has gross assets under management in excess of $100 m or is a member of an investment management group that has consolidated gross assets under management of not less than $100 m;

have an officer, trustee, or representative that is resident in Bermuda and has access to the books and records of the fund;

appoint an auditor, investment manager, fund administrator, registrar and a custodian or prime broker who are fit and proper to perform the respective functions of their office; and

prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS or GAAP.

To qualify as a Class B Exempt Fund, a fund must:

only be open to qualified participants (which includes institutional investors);

have an officer, trustee, or representative that is resident in Bermuda and has access to the books and records of the fund;

appoint an auditor, investment manager, fund administrator, registrar and a custodian or prime broker who are fit and proper to perform the respective functions of their office; and

prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS or GAAP.

Excluded Funds, Class A Exempt Funds and Class B Exempt Funds must registered as non‐licensed persons under the Bermuda’s anti‐money laundering and anti‐terrorist financing laws and regulations.

Where an open‐ended investment fund company issuing participating shares to investors incorporated in Bermuda does not qualify as an Excluded or Exempted Fund, it is required to be authorised under the IFA as:

an institutional fund if the shares are essentially offered to ‘qualified participants’ (i.e. sophisticated high ‐ net worth investors) or if the fund required a minimum investment of $100,000 per participant and has an officer, trustee or representative present in Bermuda with access to its books and records;

an administered fund if its administrator is licensed under the Investment Funds Act 2006 and requires a minimum participation of $50,000 or is listed on a recognised stock exchange; or

a standard fund if it does not qualify as under (a) or (b) above, unless exempted by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA).

Regulated funds typically require the appointment of auditors in connection with the filing of financial statements, a fund administrator and an independent custodian to safeguard the fund’s assets, unless exempted by the BMA.

ILS Funds typically invest in cat bonds, industry loss warranties (ILWs) and a variety of opportunistic reinsurance products ranging from mortality bonds, property and catastrophe reinsurance through the SPI. SPI insurance contracts must be fully‐funded and the parties to the transactions must be sophisticated. As a result, the SPIs enjoy an expedited application process, overall lighter regulation and only nominal capital requirements.

The SPI may be owned and operated in tandem with the Fund with the fund allocating capital to the SPI to fund specific ILS participations underwritten by the SPI. The SPI distributes earned premium and investment profits to the Fund.

In addition to the structuring above, the Fund and the SPI have the power and ability to legally segregate and profile investor classes, or strategies and transactions by registering the entities as segregated accounts companies (SAC) under the Segregated Accounts Companies Act 2000, as amended. This would enable an SAC Fund to issue multi‐class securities to investors linked to individual risk profiles and investment appetites, mandates and strategies. Registering the SPI as a SAC also has the advantage of isolating and ring‐fencing the legal and financial risks in respect of each cat bond or reinsurance programmewithin separate cell structures achieving limited or non‐recourse to the other assets of the SPI, ensuring the continuity and integrity of the overall structure against adverse results, claims or liabilities.

As the Bermuda insurance market continues to grow and the product offerings continue to expand, the ILS industry is likely to continue to expand. The BMA has reported an increased number of insurance and reinsurance company registrations on the island in the first two months of 2018, which was helped by an increase in the number of special purpose insurers being registered for ILS transactions and there is no sign of this trend slowing anytime soon.

Share
More publications
Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.

Website-Code-Bermuda-1
10 Apr 2026

Bermuda Regulatory Update – Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026

On 31 March 2026, the Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026 and the Economic Substance Amendment Regulations 2026 (together, the “2026 Amendments”) came into force, enacting changes to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (“ES Act”) and Economic Substance Regulations 2018.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
10 Apr 2026

Digital asset developments and Bermuda’s regulatory readiness

While frightening to some, “finance bros” and “tech bros” are now wearing the same gilets as traditional finance products and structures are being infused with digital asset adaptation.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2026

Navigating Bermuda’s New Recovery Planning Requirements: A Roadmap for Commercial Insurers

On 20 March 2026, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) issued an updated Guidance Note for Recovery Planning Requirements (Guidance Note). The Guidance Note assists Bermuda commercial insurers’ compliance with the obligations set out in the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Recovery Plan) Rules 2024 (Rules), which became operative on 1 May 2025.