Important Changes to Bermuda’s Regulation of Investment Funds

Published: 4 Mar 2019
Type: Insight

First published in HFM Week

In keeping with a global shift in the level of regulatory oversight and supervision of investment funds, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) has adopted amendments to the investment funds regime to ensure that regulatory oversight of its investment fund industry is in line with international standards.


The amendments to the investment fund regime were adopted under the Economic Substance Act 2018 (Substance Act) which became operational on 31 December 2018. The Act has a broader mandate to address concerns raised by the European Union with respect to perceived harmful tax practices across member states as well as third countries such as Bermuda.

Funds are not within scope of the Substance Act although a Bermuda incorporated fund manager may be subject to economic substance requirements and will need to assess whether the new requirements are applicable. In addition to these new economic substance requirements, the Substance Act also introduced legislative changes to the Investment Funds Act 2006 (IFA).

One of the key changes to the IFA is a change in nomenclature such that reference to “excluded funds” (i.e. a fund with fewer than 20 investors, which does not promote itself by communicating an invitation or inducement to the public generally) has been removed and has been replaced with the term “private fund.”

Additionally, exempted funds will now be known as professional funds. Exempted funds included Class A exempt funds and Class B exempt funds, which will now be known as Professional Class A funds and Professional Class B funds. Professional funds and private funds will collectively be known as registered funds.

Professional funds are funds which are open only to qualified participants and which, amongst other requirements, either (i) appoint an investment manager that is licensed in Bermuda or is authorised or licensed by a foreign regulator recognised by the BMA (for example the SEC) in order to qualify as a Professional Class A fund or (ii) which have appointed an investment manager, a fund administrator, a registrar, an auditor and a custodian or prime broker, being persons who, in the BMA’s view, are fit and proper to perform the respective functions of their office, in order to qualify as a Professional Class B fund.

In addition to a change in nomenclature, the IFA amendments have introduced an important change to the procedure for launching registered funds. Previously, a Class A exempt fund could take advantage of the self-certification process and would not need to obtain the prior approval of the BMA. Now, all registered funds must apply to the BMA for registration and approval before it can commence trading.

Under the new regime, private funds are now required to appoint a Bermuda-based service provider that is authorised and regulated by the BMA (for example a Bermuda licensed fund administrator). Helpfully, the definition of “service provider” under the IFA has also been expanded so that it now also includes corporate services providers (CSP). As most funds engage a CSP (to provide, among other things, registered office services), we anticipate the majority of funds will already meet this requirement.

New filing requirements have also been introduced in respect of private funds (the existing annual certification for professional funds will continue). A private fund will now be required to certify on an annual basis that it satisfies the qualifying criteria to be a private fund. In addition to confirming that it meets the requirements to remain registered as a private fund, it will also be required to file (i) information on its NAV, (ii) a copy of its management accounts or audited financial statements and (iii) details of any material changes that took place during the course of the relevant period.

An additional change to note is the requirement for a private fund to also file a copy of its offering document with the BMA. Private funds are also required to appoint a custodian to ensure safekeeping of the fund’s assets although the BMA may, in appropriate circumstances, waive this requirement.

The IFA amendments grant the BMA additional powers to make fund rules as to (i) prudential requirements applicable to registered funds and obligations of the fund operator with respect to its service providers; (ii) obligations with respect to depositary functions and safekeeping obligations; and (iii) additional requirements related to reports to the BMA, public disclosure and disclosure to investors.

What do funds need to do?

Funds which are currently excluded or a Class A exempt or Class B exempt fund have until 30 June to comply with any new requirements. While the majority of the affected funds are likely to already comply with the new requirements, it may be necessary to file additional information (such as details of the authorised and regulated service provider in Bermuda and filing of its offering document) with the BMA. We recommend that any Bermuda-based fund reach out to their legal counsel in Bermuda to confirm the applicable requirements.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.

Website-Code-Bermuda-1
10 Apr 2026

Bermuda Regulatory Update – Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026

On 31 March 2026, the Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026 and the Economic Substance Amendment Regulations 2026 (together, the “2026 Amendments”) came into force, enacting changes to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (“ES Act”) and Economic Substance Regulations 2018.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
10 Apr 2026

Digital asset developments and Bermuda’s regulatory readiness

While frightening to some, “finance bros” and “tech bros” are now wearing the same gilets as traditional finance products and structures are being infused with digital asset adaptation.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2026

Navigating Bermuda’s New Recovery Planning Requirements: A Roadmap for Commercial Insurers

On 20 March 2026, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) issued an updated Guidance Note for Recovery Planning Requirements (Guidance Note). The Guidance Note assists Bermuda commercial insurers’ compliance with the obligations set out in the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Recovery Plan) Rules 2024 (Rules), which became operative on 1 May 2025.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
13 Mar 2026

A will trust can keep a home in the family

In Bermuda, a family homestead represents more than financial value; it embodies ancestral heritage and housing security.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Mar 2026

Privacy at Work: What PIPA Means for Bermuda Employers

The Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (PIPA), which came into force on 1 January 2025, represents Bermuda’s first comprehensive date protection regime. The legislation regulates the collection, use, disclosure and storage of personal information with the objective of protecting individuals’ privacy while allowing organisations to use data in a responsible and transparent manner. PIPA applies broadly to organisations operating in Bermuda, including employers. As a result, the employment relationship is one of the contexts in which the practical impact of PIPA is the most significant. Employers routinely process large volumes of personal information relating to employees and job applicants, and PIPA imposes obligations that affect recruitment, workplace monitoring, record-keeping, and disciplinary processes.