HKEx released Consultation Conclusions on Reduction of Minimum Spreads and New Corporate Governance Code

Published: 19 Feb 2025
Type: Insight

In December 2024, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Exchange“) released two consultation conclusions (the “Consultation Conclusions“) following two consultation papers (the “Consultation Papers“) on the (i) Proposed Reduction of Minimum Spreads in the Hong Kong Securities Market; and (ii) the Review of the Corporate Governance Code and related Main Board and GEM Listing Rules aiming to (a) enhance market microstructure with a goal to improve market liquidity and global competitiveness of the Hong Kong market by facilitating bid-ask spread reduction and transaction costs savings; and (b) strike an appropriate balance between advancing good corporate governance practices in Hong Kong as an international financial centre and addressing the practical concerns of listed issuers.


Proposed Reduction of Minimum Spreads in the Hong Kong Securities Market

Feedback on the Consultation Papers demonstrate overall market support for the proposed minimum spreads reduction of the applicable securities in the Hong Kong securities market.

In phase 1, the minimum spreads of the price band between HKD10 and HKD20 of the applicable securities will be reduced from HKD0.02 to HKD0.01, and those between HKD20 and HKD50 will be reduced from HKD0.05 to HKD0.02. In phase 2, the minimum spread of the price band between HKD0.5 and HKD10 will be reduced by 50%.

Phase 1 is now planned for launch around mid-2025 to give adequate preparation time for the market. The implementation details including the relevant rule changes and implementation timetable will be announced in due course. Phase 2 will be implemented tentatively around mid-2026 if no undesirable impact is observed in the assessment of results from the phase 1 implementation, and subject to market readiness.

Review of Corporate Governance Code and Related Listing Rules

Sound corporate governance is considered by investors as an essential foundation for a business’s long-term success, particularly as markets become more dynamic, competitive and uncertain. The new measures reflect Exchange’s continued focus on improving board effectiveness and help to ensure that new and diverse experiences and perspectives are available in the boardroom, with the aim of improving issuers’ decision-making when tackling known and emerging challenges and opportunities. The new requirements will take effect on 1 July 2025, with transitional arrangements in place for certain amendments. The Exchange will publish updated guidance in the first half of 2025 to assist issuers in complying with the new requirements. Key amendments include:

Designation of lead independent non-executive director (“Lead INED”) – Issuers without an independent board chair should designate one INED as a Lead INED.

Director Training – Every director of the issuers must receive continuous professional development in each financial year of the issuers.

Board Performance Review – An issuer should conduct a formal evaluation of the board’s performance at least every two years.

Disclosure of Board Skills Matrix – An issuer should maintain and disclose in the corporate governance report a board skills matrix (which should include the existing board skills mix, how the skills, experience, and diversity of the board serve the company’s purpose, values, strategy and desired culture, and plans to acquire further skills).

INED Term Limit – The Exchange will not consider a director to be independent if the individual has been an INED of the issuer for a period of nine years or more.

Board and Workforce Diversity – Issuers should appoint at least one director of a different gender to the nomination committee. Separate disclosure of the gender ratio of senior management and the workforce.

Dividends – Issuers must have a policy on payment of dividends and should disclose it in the annual report.

Share
More publications
The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
23 Apr 2026

FamilyMart and Beyond: The Continuing Influence of the Privy Council’s Landmark Decision on Shareholder Litigation

The Privy Council's decision in FamilyMart China Holding Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp [2023] UKPC 33 is a landmark ruling that distinguishes the arbitrability of underlying shareholder disputes from the court's exclusive jurisdiction over just and equitable winding-up of a Cayman company.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Prospects of Asian Companies in U.S. Listings in 2026

Nasdaq introduced a series of rule changes in 2025 to raise minimum requirements for public float and offering size for certain new listings.

IWD website preview
9 Mar 2026

International Women’s Day 2026 Roundtable: Rights. Justice. Action. For all women and girls.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
28 Oct 2025

Updates on Hong Kong’s Uncertificated Securities Market Regime from an offshore perspective

Hong Kong’s uncertificated securities market ("USM”) initiative is scheduled to take effect in 2026, subject to market readiness.

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
21 Oct 2025

Redemption of Cayman shares in Chinese Red Chip corporate groups – latest developments and ideas for investors

This article provides an overview of the key legal issues facing preference shareholders in Cayman Islands companies when considering enforcing their redemption rights.

Appleby-Website-Structured-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
26 Sep 2025

Structured lending for hyperscale data center providers: offshore spvs powering securitisation driven capital solutions

The exponential growth of hyperscale data centers, driven by surging demand for cloud computing, artificial intelligence and digital infrastructure, is reshaping the way these assets are financed. As operators seek to scale rapidly, bank debt funding is moving towards capital markets solutions. Securitisation, particularly in Asia, is emerging as a strategic tool to monetise long-term lease receivables, with offshore SPVs playing a pivotal role in enabling cross-border capital flows.

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
25 Sep 2025

Typical Collateral Package in Cayman Fund Financing

The recovery of the Asian fund finance market over the past couple of years has reinforced the dominance of the Cayman Islands as the jurisdiction of choice for offshore fund structures.  The security package remains a key consideration for lenders in fund finance transactions.  This article provides an overview of the main types of collateral that lenders typically seek when lending to Cayman Islands fund vehicles under different types of facilities.

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
21 Aug 2025

Hong Kong and Australian courts recognise principles of segregation in Cayman SPCs

In two recent judgments, Tjin Joen Joe, Andy Tsjoe Kong and another v Oakwise Value Fund SPC [2025] HKCFI 1281 (Oakwise Value Fund) and Cowan, in the matter of Coinful Capital Fund, SPC (in Official Liquidation) [2025] FCA 315 (Coinful Capital Fund), the High Court of Hong Kong and the Federal Court of Australia have recognised fundamental principles underpinning the Cayman Islands segregated portfolio companies (SPC) regime.

Dispute Resolution
28 Jun 2025

High Court of Hong Kong confirms arbitrability of shareholder claims for oppression and loss of confidence

In the recent decision in PI 1 & PI 2 v MR [2025] HKCFI 1110 (PI 1 & PI 2), the High Court of Hong Kong confirmed that certain factual and legal disputes are arbitrable, even where their determination may serve as a precursor to the winding up of a Cayman Islands company on just and equitable grounds. Notably, the High Court of Hong Kong has, for the first time, expressly adopted the reasoning of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (the JCPC) in FamilyMart China Holdings Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp [2023] UKPC 33; [2024] Bus LR 190 (FamilyMart).