Fostering Respect: the Importance of Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policies in Bermuda (Part 2)

Published: 18 Feb 2025
Type: Insight

Under the Employment Act 2000 (EA), it is a requirement for an employer to not only have a compliant policy statement against bullying and sexual harassment (the Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy), but to bring it to the attention of its employees.

In this two-part series, we explain how an employer can ensure that they are adhering to the relevant legislative requirements and highlight the potential consequences of not doing so.

In the first article on this topic, we looked at what a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy must contain, and how it must be introduced to employees. In this article, we consider the consequences of not having a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy, as well as how an employee can make a complaint under the Human Rights Act 1981 (HRA).

What are the consequences of not having a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy?

As stated in our previous article, it is a statutory requirement for an employer to have a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy. Any employer who does not have such a policy, or who does not have a policy which is compliant with the requirements of the EA (as detailed in Part 1), “shall be liable to a civil penalty” (s.10B(6) of the EA).

Under the EA, a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 can be imposed by the Manager of Labour Relations (s.37A of the EA) and a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 can be imposed by the Employment and Labour Relations Tribunal (s.44M of the EA).

Whilst these sums may not sound substantial to many businesses, the reality is that often the lack of a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy will only come to light where there is a complaint before either the Supreme Court, the Employment and Labour Relations Tribunal, or the Human Rights Tribunal. In such circumstances, the absence of a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy can be used to draw adverse inferences about the culture of a company and the conduct of an employer. It may also generate unwanted adverse publicity for the employer.

More importantly, where an employer is able to show that they have taken all reasonable steps in the circumstances to educate and train employees to not engage in such bullying or harassing behaviours (e.g. by providing a Bulling and Sexual Harassment Policy and associated training), then there is a possibility for the employer to legally separate themselves from the perpetrating employee.

Making a complaint under the Human Rights Act

As stated in Part 1 of this series, a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy must include a statement which informs employees of their right to make a complaint under the HRA where sexual harassment has been committed against them.

An employee has “a right to freedom in his workplace from sexual harassment by his employer, or by an agent of his employer, or by a fellow employee, and notwithstanding any requirements in relation to the responsibilities of employers under any other enactment, an employer shall take such action as it reasonably necessary to ensure that sexual harassment does not occur in the workplace” (s.9(3) of the HRA).

Where an employee considers that sexual harassment has taken place against them in the workplace, they can submit a complaint under the HRA to the Human Rights Commission (s.14H of the HRA). Such a complaint can be made orally, electronically or in writing within six months of the incident (however in some cases, a complaint may validly be made up to two years after the incident where there are good reasons for delay and no one will be prejudiced by the delay).

In the event that bullying has a discriminatory element other than sexual harassment, then an employee would also be able to make a complaint to the Human Rights Commission in the same way.

Making a complaint under the Employment Act

Where an employee suffers bullying without a discriminatory element, and an employer does not adequately address the behavior in line with its Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy, or at all, then it could be open to the employee to bring a claim for constructive dismissal under the EA.

An employee can resign and terminate their contract of employment, on a without notice basis, in circumstances “where the employer’s conduct has made it unreasonable to expect the employee to continue the employment relationship, having regard to the employee’s duties, length of service and circumstances” (s.29 of the EA). That employee is deemed to be unfairly dismissed and, such cases, are commonly referred to as constructive unfair dismissal.

The importance of having a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy

The purpose of a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy is to eliminate bullying and sexual harassment in the workplace, and to ensure that all employees understand that their company will not tolerate bullying and sexual harassment. By implanting such policies and associated training, employers will be able to reduce the potential for such behaviours occurring.

The potential financial consequences of losing an unfair dismissal or discrimination claim could far exceed $10,000. As such, the risks of not having a Bullying and Sexual Harassment Policy outweigh any potential inconvenience to an employer of implementing one.

First Published in the Bermuda Chamber of Commerce Newsletter (Chamber Insider), February 2025

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2026

Navigating Bermuda’s New Recovery Planning Requirements: A Roadmap for Commercial Insurers

On 20 March 2026, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) issued an updated Guidance Note for Recovery Planning Requirements (Guidance Note). The Guidance Note assists Bermuda commercial insurers’ compliance with the obligations set out in the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Recovery Plan) Rules 2024 (Rules), which became operative on 1 May 2025.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
13 Mar 2026

A will trust can keep a home in the family

In Bermuda, a family homestead represents more than financial value; it embodies ancestral heritage and housing security.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Mar 2026

Privacy at Work: What PIPA Means for Bermuda Employers

The Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (PIPA), which came into force on 1 January 2025, represents Bermuda’s first comprehensive date protection regime. The legislation regulates the collection, use, disclosure and storage of personal information with the objective of protecting individuals’ privacy while allowing organisations to use data in a responsible and transparent manner. PIPA applies broadly to organisations operating in Bermuda, including employers. As a result, the employment relationship is one of the contexts in which the practical impact of PIPA is the most significant. Employers routinely process large volumes of personal information relating to employees and job applicants, and PIPA imposes obligations that affect recruitment, workplace monitoring, record-keeping, and disciplinary processes.

IWD website preview
9 Mar 2026

International Women’s Day 2026 Roundtable: Rights. Justice. Action. For all women and girls.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

Dispute Resolution
4 Mar 2026

Bermuda: An Overview of Insurance: Contentious

There has been a recent increase in policyholder disputes involving coverage challenges by (re)insurers in the context of Bermuda high-value, excess-of-loss policies. This is, in part, due to Bermuda’s commercial (re)insurers facing a marked and sustained rise in the volume of claims, incurring claims costs globally of BMD1.1 trillion from 2016 through 2024. The massive volume and quantum of claims can be attributed in part to the significance of the Bermuda (re)insurance market in the global economy, as well as Bermuda’s exposure to catastrophic losses caused by natural disasters over this period. Bermuda’s increased exposure to global (re)insurance risks has naturally resulted in an increase in complex claims and coverage disputes.

Employment-and-Immigration
27 Feb 2026

Pay transparency heading Bermuda’s way?

The culture of secrecy with respect to pay traditionally found in workplaces may soon experience a shift, as global lawmakers and governments have enacted or moved toward enacting legislation to mandate greater pay transparency.