Employer's perspective: What to expect in a settlement agreement?

Published: 15 Sep 2023
Type: Insight

What is a ‘Settlement Agreement’?

One of the innovations of the Workers’ Rights Act (‘Act’) is the concept of ‘compromise agreement’ (also referred to as a ‘Settlement Agreement’ in this article) (‘Compromise Agreement’).

Under the WRA, a Compromise Agreement may be entered into, by the employer and worker in order to resolve disputes concerning, amongst others,

  1. the amount of compensation or other related payments, following the termination of employment, or
  2. the amount of remuneration payable in the event of non-payment or short payment of remuneration.

A Settlement Agreement is often used where the employer is closing down or reducing its workforce and does not wish to go to the Industrial Court or the Redundancy Board for a resolution of the dispute.

When is a Settlement Agreement legally valid?

A Settlement Agreement is valid and binding when it has been examined by an independent adviser or where the worker has received independent legal advice prior to entering into the Settlement Agreement. In this regard, an independent adviser may be a qualified law practitioner or a member of the registered trade union or an officer of the Ministry of Labour, Human Resource Development and training.

First step: Notice

Section 63 of the Act provides that the minimum notice period shall be 30 days which can be contractually extended. The employer must, at the time of notifying the worker, state the reason for termination of employment. The notice may be verbal or written.

The notice period will not apply where the employer summarily dismisses the worker on grounds of poor performance or misconduct under sections 64-66 of the Act, or where the worker has reached the retirement age.

Payment in lieu of notice

Alternatively, the Act allows the terminating party to terminate employment with immediate effect by making a ‘payment in lieu of notice’ equivalent to the remuneration (which includes the basic salary and benefits) that the worker would have earned during the notice period.

Second step: Initiating negotiations

Employers are encouraged to initiate negotiations with their workers in order to agree on the terms of termination and settlement amount. The confidentiality of these negotiations may be protected under the ‘without prejudice’ rule. In this regard, all communications, (i.e letters, emails, agreements) which bear the heading ‘without prejudice’, will not be admissible as evidence and cannot be disclosed in any court/other proceedings whether it is sought to be used in court by the employer or the worker.

Elements of a settlement agreement

  1. Compensation Amount
    In addition to payment of the outstanding remuneration and all payments that were initially agreed in the employment contract, the employer may introduce a compensation amount to favour settlement. The threshold for such compensation is usually the amount of severance allowance calculated in accordance with the Act.
  2. Garden Leave
    The employer may allow the worker reasonable time off in order to seek further employment during the notice period without any loss of pay on satisfactory proof of the purpose of the request. The employer may, therefore, agree for a garden leave period from the date of notice until the termination date.
  3. Waivers
    To provide additional protection to the employer, waivers may be included in the settlement agreement such that the worker agrees to waive all rights to bring future claims against the employer in relation to the termination of employment.

Other considerations:

Upon termination of an employment contract, the Act provides that the employer shall pay the following into the Portable Retirement Gratuity Fund (PRGF) (where applicable):

  • Unpaid monthly contribution: The employer shall pay to any unpaid monthly contribution in relation its worker to the Mauritius Revenue Authority (MRA).
  • Payment for Past Services: The employment shall pay for the past services of the worker to the MRA no later than one month after the date of termination of employment.

The contribution to the PRGF is not applicable where

  1. the employer has a private pension scheme (as defined in the Act) or
  2. the worker earns a monthly basic salary exceeding MUR 200,000. The employer may deduct the contributions payable to the PRGF from the compensation amount.

Conclusion

As discussed above, steps to reduce workforce and negotiations to reach a settlement agreement may be tricky. In case of doubt, you should seek legal advice.

Should you require further information on the contents of this article, please contact Vaishali Damonaiko or Suhaylah Juman.

 

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Mergers-and-Acquisitions
2 Mar 2026

The Cost of Dissent: Managing Liquidity and Statutory Validity in Major Mauritian Transactions

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) are intricate manoeuvres that demand more than just commercial synergy; they require absolute statutory precision.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
24 Feb 2026

Receivership - Does a fixed charge rank ahead of a banking or fiscal privilege?

The question of priority ranking between the different types of securities in Mauritius is not purely technical. It is a fundamental question at the very heart of creditor protection, enforcement and the stability and security of secured lending.

Appleby-Website-Fund-Finance
28 Jan 2026

Fund Finance Laws and Regulations 2026 – Mauritius

The Mauritius fund industry demonstrated significant resilience and adaptability in 2025, successfully navigating a complex period of global tax reform and heightened regulatory standards. The year was defined by the integration of the 2025 Finance Act’s new tax framework (including the Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax, or QDMTT) and a reinforced focus on economic substance, such as the two resident director rule for global business companies (GBCs). This pivot has further solidified the jurisdiction’s move from a tax-led financial centre to a substance-based one. Private equity and debt funds, particularly those focused on African and Asian markets, continue todominate the landscape, with Mauritius retaining its top-tier ranking as an investment gateway for Africa. The variable capital company (VCC) structure remains a popular choice for its flexibility, supplemented by a mature ecosystem of legal and administrative experts.

Appleby-Website-Transport-and-Logistics
13 Jan 2026

Maritime Due Diligence: Mauritius at crossroads

The year 2025 has witnessed a wave of revocations of Authorised Companies’ Licenses – more than 25 - by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) in Mauritius, pursuant to section 74(5) of the Financial Services Act.

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Financial-Services
8 Oct 2025

Enforcing Integrity: The UK’s Legal Arsenal Against Market Abuse

The legal concept of market abuse and the twin concept of upholding market integrity are not new as these were prevalent since the 17th century ¹. As a matter of fact, there is a belief that insider dealing was the root cause of demise of the South Sea Company in the 18th century.

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
9 Sep 2025

Dual Remedies Afforded against the Granting of Injunctions

Actis Consumer Grooming Products Ltd v Super-Max Mauritius [2025 SCJ 388]

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
27 Aug 2025

The Mauritian National Budget 2025/2026 - From abyss to prosperity: Rebuilding the bridge to future

On 05 June 2025, Dr Navinchandra Ramgoolam GCSK, FRCP, Prime Minister of Mauritius, in his capacity as Minister of Finance (Minister of Finance) tabled the National Budget for the fiscal year 2025-2026 under the theme “From Abyss to Prosperity: Rebuilding the Bridge to the Future”.

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution
18 Aug 2025

Mauritius as an Ideal Seat for Arbitration

In one of its recent determinations, the Mauritian Supreme Court re-affirmed a line of decisions which confirmed its support to arbitration, whether international or domestic. These determinations reflect its understanding of the needs of business community, characterised by a marked choice to resolve disputes through a private mechanism to allow existing business relationships to thrive.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
25 Jul 2025

Insider Dealing: A Review of the Treatment in Mauritius, EU and US Federal law

A review of the treatment in Mauritius, the United States and the European Union of the offence of insider trading confirms the contrasting approaches which these jurisdictions have adopted on the issue even though all three jurisdictions share two fundamental concerns namely, (i) the prohibition on an insider to take an unfair advantage by reason of information which he has obtained to the detriment of third parties who are unaware of such information and, (ii) the protection of the integrity of financial markets and investor confidence ¹.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
20 Jun 2025

Professional emails are personal data

Case Commentary – France, Cour de cassation, 18 June 2025, 23-19.022 Professional emails are personal data.