Section 5 of the Payroll Tax Act 1995 (Act) provides, in its pertinent parts, (a) an individual who is a director, officer or member of the governing body of a body corporate (i.e. registered company) is an employee of that body corporate for the purposes of the Act; (b) an individual who is a director, officer or member of the governing body of an exempt undertaking is not for the purposes of the Act an employee of that exempt undertaking, but he is for those purposes such an employee if under a contract of service he regularly performs managerial functions in connection with the day-today conduct of the exempt undertaking’s affairs.

Pursuant to the Act, an “exempt undertaking” includes, inter alia, an exempted undertaking and that term has the meaning assigned to it in the Companies Act 1981 (Companies Act), namely, an exempted company registered under the Companies Act and is stated in its memorandum to be an exempted company. The Act does provide certain carve outs for exempted companies (e.g. one which requires a licence under the Companies Act or authority under some other public Act to carry on business or a private Act company which would otherwise require such a licence or authority).

A body corporate that is not an exempt undertaking includes a local company.

Accordingly, directors of:

  1. a local company or
  2. of an exempted company (subject to the above carve outs), who under a contract of service he regularly performs managerial functions in connection with the day-today conduct of the exempt undertaking’s affairs,

are considered “employees” for the purposes of the Act.

Section 4 of the Act generally provides that for the purposes of the Act, the employer of a person (call the employer “A” and the latter “B”) is the person to whom B renders services as A’s employee within section 5.

The effect of sections 4 and 5 of the Act is that where a director is considered an employee for the purposes of the Act (as set out above), the company in which such director is acting as director will be liable to payroll tax in respect of any remuneration paid to that director in his capacity as director and payroll tax will also be chargeable on such director as if he were an employee for any remuneration paid to him in his capacity as director.

This note is intended as a high level overview of this topic and there may be a number of other issues which will also require consideration. Legal advice should always be sought on a case by case basis.

Type

Insight

Locations

Bermuda

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
22 Sep 2020 |

Cost-cutting and the alternatives to redundancy

Even as Bermuda acclimatises to the ‘new normal’, it is clear that the economic effects of the p...

10 Sep 2020 |

Bermudian LLCs: a flexible solution

It’s been almost four years since limited liability companies were brought to Bermuda on October 1...

27 Aug 2020 |

Indemnities and ‘as soon as possible’ notice

Indemnity clauses represent a contractual transfer of risk between parties to a transaction, the pur...

27 Aug 2020 |

Bermuda welcomes new residents

On 1 August 2020, the Bermuda Government launched a one-year ‘Work from Bermuda’ residential cer...

20 Aug 2020 |

Bermuda amends trust law firewall provisions and restores settlor’s freedom of disposition with respect to children

Vanessa Schrum reviews recent amendments to Bermuda’s trust laws which are intended to modernise ...

18 Aug 2020 |

Technology & Innovation update Q3 2020

In each quarterly issue of the Appleby Asia Alert, we bring you the latest offshore legislative and ...

18 Aug 2020 |

Economic Substance update Q3 2020

The latest Economic Substance updates announced by the relevant authorities in the BVI, Cayman and B...