Contributed surplus: it’s not capital!

Published: 23 Jul 2021
Type: Insight

First published in The Royal Gazette, Legally Speaking, July 2021

Last week, in part one, we discussed the meaning of share premium, the various ways a company may use share premium and its importance when determining the assessable capital of a company.

Today, we will discuss contributed surplus, another frequently misunderstood concept which is distinct from and is not to be confused with share premium.

Contributed surplus is defined under section 54(2) of the Companies Act 1981, as amended, as including “proceeds arising from donated shares, credits resulting from redemption or conversion of shares at less than the amount set up as nominal capital and donations of cash and other assets of the company”.

On the balance sheet of a company, contributed surplus appears as a separate line entry on the equity side of the balance sheet and is a quasi-equity account.

Contributed surplus differs from share premium in a number of material ways, including that (i) it is gratuitous in nature; (ii) it does not count towards the determination of a company’s assessable capital; and (iii) a company can make distributions out of its contributed surplus account that do not offend the capital maintenance rules.

Contributed surplus is a gift to the company that could be in the form of cash or other assets. The distinguishing feature is that the company does not issue shares in exchange for the contribution. Remarkably, the Companies Act is permissive; a person who is not a shareholder can make a contribution to any company.

Further, contributed surplus does not count in the determination of a company’s assessable capital, which is used to calculate the annual government fee that a company is required to pay to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies.

Finally, the contributed surplus account may be used to make a distribution, provided the company can satisfy the “solvency test” and “net asset test” as set out in section 54 of the Companies Act.

Therefore, unlike with a statutory reduction of share premium that requires, amongst other things, a legal notice to be published and shareholder consent, a company does not need to be concerned that it will be in breach of certain capital maintenance rules when utilising assets recorded in the company’s contributed surplus account.

In addition to making a distribution from its contributed surplus account to its shareholders, it is common for companies to use a contributed surplus account to off-set debt owing to its shareholders or to grant loans to its subsidiaries.

It must be underscored that a shareholder does not have a right to claim the money that has been credited to the contributed surplus account, notwithstanding that he or she may have donated any portion or all of the assets in the account.

To ensure the contributed surplus account is accurate, companies should pass a resolution approving distributions from its contributed surplus account as well as acknowledging receipt of the funds constituting contributed surplus.

While there is no statutory requirement to do so, in practice, as a matter of good corporate governance it is prudent to ensure amounts constituting contributed surplus are properly recorded and to expressly distinguish that the contribution is not for a subscription of shares.

Companies have a legal responsibility to ensure the contributed surplus account is accurate or they could face financial penalties.

Therefore, if in any doubt, please obtain legal advice on the proper characterisation and any steps required to record, reduce or distribute monies from the contributed surplus account of the company.

This column should not be used as a substitute for professional legal advice. Before proceeding with any matters discussed here, persons are advised to consult with a lawyer.

Share
More publications
050-Insolvency-Restructuring-Grid-Image
13 Jul 2026

Bermuda: Restructuring & Insolvency

This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of Restructuring & Insolvency laws and regulations applicable in Bermuda.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
10 Jul 2026

It’s healthy to sometimes disagree with regulators

At some point, almost every regulated business will disagree with its regulator.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
8 Jul 2026

Bermuda Privacy Commissioner Signals Shift to Stronger PIPA Enforcement

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (PrivCom) has issued its first annual report since Bermuda's Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (PIPA) came fully into force, with the reports content signaling a transition from education and implementation to a stronger focus on enforcement.

Bermuda-1024x576-1
1 Jul 2026

A Forest for the Future

A first since the blight, the airport cedar forest is growing tall and standing strong.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
1 Jul 2026

Complied out of business

Firms are complying themselves out of business because compliance no longer matches the evolving sophistication of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA).

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

The long game: how Bermuda became the world’s life reinsurance capital

Ask a life insurer in New York, London or Tokyo where the liabilities behind their book ultimately sit and there is an increasingly good chance the answer is a 21-square-mile island in the North Atlantic.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

Record H1’26 Cat Bond Issuance Driven by Rising Sponsor Comfort and Diversified Risk

With H1 2026 officially breaking the record for the most catastrophe bond deals to come to market and settle in the first six months of the year, a key trend driving this momentum is how comfortable sponsors have become with the mechanics of the overall cat bond space. This familiarity has ultimately encouraged a wave of new sponsors to enter the market, according to Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Jun 2026

The Cost of Getting Employee Departures Wrong: Five Common Pitfalls for Bermuda Employers

Employee departures are an inevitable part of running a business, but the way they are managed can have significant legal, financial and operational consequences. In Bermuda, employers who approach terminations without adequate preparation may expose themselves to unnecessary disputes, regulatory issues, and reputational harm. Whether an employee is being dismissed for performance reasons, made redundant or departing as part of a negotiated exit, by recognizing the following common mistakes and taking a proactive approach, organizations can manage departures more effectively and reduce risk.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
8 Jun 2026

It’s time to bridge Pipa compliance gap

A review of 200 publicly available privacy notices of companies in Bermuda has revealed that just one in nine are fully compliant with the Personal Information Protection Act 2016.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
26 May 2026

Transparency is a legal requirement under Pipa

Major companies across the European Union have faced substantial fines between 2019 and 2024, estimated at a total of €930 million (about $1.08 billion), not only for cyberattacks or data breaches, but also for issues such as noncompliant privacy notices. A common theme in many cases has been a lack of transparency.