Changes to the Employment Act 2000 – Part 2

Published: 29 Jan 2021
Type: Insight

First Published in The Bermuda Chamber Of Commerce Newsletter (Chamber Insider), February 2021

This is the second in our series of articles looking at upcoming changes to the Employment Act 2000 (Act), Bermuda’s key piece of employment legislation, introduced by way of the Employment Amendment (No.2) Act 2020. Since the publication of last month’s article, the amending legislation has been passed by the Senate and is due to come into force on 1 June 2021.

Below, we briefly outline the key changes that were not covered in our previous article and consider some of the practical implications.

Bullying and harassment

New clause 10B will make it a legal requirement for employers to have in place a written policy against bullying and sexual harassment within the workplace. That policy must contain certain terms, including:

  • a statement that employees are entitled to a workplace free from bullying and sexual harassment;
  • a statement that the employer will make “every reasonable effort” to ensure that no employee is subject to bullying or sexual harassment;
  • details as to how complaints may be brought to the employer’s attention.

The Act also includes definitions of “sexual harassment” and “bullying” that employers are required to use, in substance, in their policy. There are many notable elements of the definitions used in the Act, which would merit an article in their own right, but the following points are of particular interest:

  • the definition of “sexual harassment” is different to that used in the Human Rights Act 1981 (HRA), meaning that an employee could be subject to harassment falling foul of their employer’s policy but which does not entitle them to bring a legal claim;
  • many employers already have policies against this type of conduct which use more inclusive definitions than those used in the Act, meaning that well-intentioned employers may feel pressured to amend their policies in a manner which weakens the protection they currently offer their employees.

Employers will also be subject to a broad obligation to ensure that “procedures are put in place to assist every employee in understanding the policy”. This arguably places employers under a positive duty to deliver training to employees on bullying and sexual harassment issues.

Redundancy consultation

Before making an employee redundant, employers will now be required to give certain information to the employee, including the reasons for the proposed redundancy and the number and categories of employees affected by the redundancy situation. The Employee must also be consulted on possible measures that could be taken to avert, minimise or mitigate the adverse effects of the redundancy. These steps must be taken at least 14 days before giving notice of termination.

This is the first time that employers will have been subject to a legal obligation to inform and consult with employees on redundancies (although many did so anyway, as a matter of good practice). Currently, these steps are only required where the employee is represented by a trade union or other employee representative.

Similar duties will also need to be satisfied before making lay-offs.

Independent contractors

A new power is to be introduced for the Government to issue guidance for the purpose of determining “whether a relationship more closely resembles that of an employee than an independent contractor”. When it is published, such guidance should help provide clarity as to whether an individual is an employee, in which case they are entitled to the various employment rights and protections under the Act, or whether they are a self-employed contractor, in which case they are not.

Influenced by the growth of the so-called ‘gig’ economy, where workers are often labelled as self-employed contractors even though their engagement may bare many of the features of a classic employment relationship, the question of whether someone is an ‘employee’ has been an increasingly contested area of law in the US and UK in recent years. As such, any future guidance in Bermuda should be of much interest to employers and workers alike.

Limitation period

At present, an employee has three months within which to make a complaint that his employer has failed to comply with the Act. From 1 June 2021, this will be increased to six months.

Unfair dismissal compensation

The minimum compensation award for a successful unfair dismissal claim by an employee with no more than two years’ service is to be increased, from two weeks’ wages per completed year of employment, to three.

Statement of Employment

Additional matters will now need to be addressed in the ‘statement of employment’ required to be given to all employees under s.6 of the Act, including:

  • their entitlement to rest days and meal breaks;
  • their entitlement to overtime pay or hours in lieu, and the method of calculation;
  • where applicable, the fact that the employment is pursuant to a work permit and the expiry date of that permit; and
  • the existence of the employer’s policy on sexual harassment and bullying and how that policy can be accessed.

It is not an understatement to say that the upcoming changes represent a significant overhaul of the Act. While some will necessitate only minor tweaks to existing documents and procedures, others are more onerous or will involve a substantial change to current HR practices.

Anyone with any questions about these amendments can contact a member of our Employment and Immigration Practice: Bradley Houlston ([email protected]) or Jordan Knight ([email protected]).

Please look out for the next part in this series, which will discuss forthcoming amendments to Bermuda’s Labour Relations legislation.

Share
More publications
IWD website preview
9 Mar 2026

International Women’s Day 2026 Roundtable: Rights. Justice. Action. For all women and girls.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

Dispute Resolution
4 Mar 2026

Bermuda: An Overview of Insurance: Contentious

There has been a recent increase in policyholder disputes involving coverage challenges by (re)insurers in the context of Bermuda high-value, excess-of-loss policies. This is, in part, due to Bermuda’s commercial (re)insurers facing a marked and sustained rise in the volume of claims, incurring claims costs globally of BMD1.1 trillion from 2016 through 2024. The massive volume and quantum of claims can be attributed in part to the significance of the Bermuda (re)insurance market in the global economy, as well as Bermuda’s exposure to catastrophic losses caused by natural disasters over this period. Bermuda’s increased exposure to global (re)insurance risks has naturally resulted in an increase in complex claims and coverage disputes.

Employment-and-Immigration
27 Feb 2026

Pay transparency heading Bermuda’s way?

The culture of secrecy with respect to pay traditionally found in workplaces may soon experience a shift, as global lawmakers and governments have enacted or moved toward enacting legislation to mandate greater pay transparency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
27 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority: Modern, Thoughtful and Competitive

The Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) has signaled a clear direction for the future of insurance supervision in Bermuda by the release of its latest Notice on Regulatory Burden Reduction for Better Policyholder Outcomes (Notice).

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – Banking

Bermuda is not considered an international banking center and only banks licensed by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) under the Banks and Deposit Companies Act 1999 (BDCA) are entitled to undertake banking businesses in or from Bermuda. As banking is defined as deposit taking (as opposed to lending), international banks are generally able to lend to Bermuda-based borrowers subject to applicable restrictions relating to carrying on business in Bermuda.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – Insurance (Captives)

Bermuda is one of the leading captive insurance markets in the world with over 600 registered captive insurers writing an impressive ~$30 billion of annual gross written premiums.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – General Corporate

The Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA), an independent body that has been in existence since 1969, is an integrated regulator and supervisor responsible for the licensing, supervision and regulation of financial institutions in Bermuda. The BMA’s mandate includes entities conducting insurance, deposit taking, investment and trust business. The BMA conducts risk-based supervision and enforcement, including enforcing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing standards. The BMA sets prudential rules, issues codes of conduct and devises industry guidance to ensure the jurisdiction adheres to international standards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – Insurance (Commercial)

The Bermuda Monetary Authority’s (BMA) 2026 Business Plan (Plan) outlines continued strengthening of Bermuda’s position as a leading global insurance and reinsurance jurisdiction.

Technology-and-Innovation-1024x576
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – FinTech

By any serious measure, Bermuda’s FinTech strategy for 2026 is not incremental. It is deliberate. It is disciplined. And it is designed to position Bermuda not as a follower in digital finance — but as a standard-setter.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – Regulatory

Bermuda operates a highly integrated regulatory architecture under which the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) exercises consolidated oversight across insurance, banking, investment business and funds, trusts, corporate service providers, money services and digital asset activity. While the statutory framework has long been risk-based, the previous five years marks a clear evolution in supervisory practices. The BMA moved decisively beyond technical compliance and periodic reporting toward an emphasis on supervisory judgement, governance outcomes and system-wide resilience.