Bermudian LLCs: a flexible solution

Published: 10 Sep 2020
Type: Insight

First Published in The Royal Gazette, Legally Speaking, September 2020

It’s been almost four years since limited liability companies were brought to Bermuda on October 1, 2016 under the Limited Liability Company Act 2016.

Our LLC Act was modelled closely on Delaware’s popular limited liability statute and includes many of the same features that have made LLCs a prevalent, and comfortable, corporate vehicle in the United States.

Much ink has already been spilt highlighting the flexibility accorded to LLCs in Bermuda but this article focuses on certain features of LLCs that have taken centre stage in highlighting that flexibility in our recent experience.

While the LLC Act does contain basic provisions regarding how an LLC is formed and managed, it is also highly deferential to the desires and intentions of the LLC’s members as expressed in the governing LLC agreement. In this way, LLCs are similar to limited partnerships — with the added benefit of limited liability for all of the members and separate legal personality for the LLC itself.

Unlike limited partnerships, LLCs are not required to have the equivalent of a general partner. In contrast to a limited partnership’s management, which is vested in the general partner(s), or a company’s management, which is vested in its board of directors, the default position under the LLC Act is that the power to manage an LLC’s business is vested in its members in proportion to their interests in the LLC.

If members don’t want to partake in management or desire a more traditional corporate structure, the LLC agreement can accommodate that. An agreement can provide for a slate of “managers” or, if the members wanted they could even call them “directors”, to be appointed by the members — none of which need to be members themselves. It can also provide for the usual officers to carry on the day-to-day operations of the LLC’s business.

Once the members of an LLC have determined the management structure of the LLC they can also determine the scope of the duties and powers afforded to such managers and officers.

Unlike the Companies Act, the LLC Act allows for a manager’s duties, including fiduciary duties, to be expanded, constrained or eliminated (with the exception of permitting fraud or dishonesty). This creates the flexibility to allow a manager to act with a view to the best interests of its appointing member, rather than in the best interests of the LLC as a whole.

This is not possible in the context of a company where directors must act in the best interest of the company and not favour the interests of one member/shareholder over another.

An LLC agreement may also delineate the powers of the LLC’s managers — including incorporating member protections and consents directly into the constitutional documents of the LLC, rather than, as is often seen regarding a company, in a shareholders agreement.

In contrast to a company limited by shares, the default under the LLC Act is that an LLC’s members hold interests in the LLC corresponding to the value of the capital that they’ve contributed.

That said, you won’t be surprised to hear that an LLC’s capital structure can be tailored to reflect its members’ wishes.

Sometimes the question is asked as to whether the members can hold “shares” or “units” in the LLC. The LLC agreement can provide for that. We have seen situations where an LLC’s members needed it to issue shares at a set issue price — the flexibility of the LLC Act allowed that LLC’s capital structure to be tailored to its members’ needs.

A bespoke capital and management structure could include features from both limited partnerships and companies — including delineating how and when securities are issued and for what issue price; how and when votes occur, including who gets to vote and on which matters; how profits and losses are allocated; how distributions are determined; and how and when fees and expenses are paid or allocated.

Although an LLC agreement could recreate the capital structure of a company limited by shares, such a structure would not be subject to all of the same statutory requirements regarding distributions and dividends that companies are subject to under the Companies Act.

The LLC Act doesn’t recognise the concepts of “share capital”, “share premium” or “dividends”, all terms exclusive to companies.

As such, the LLC Act doesn’t include different procedures for reducing capital, distributing share premium, or paying dividends. Instead, it has one solvency focused test that must be met in order to make distributions to an LLC’s members: an LLC’s manager(s) must not have reasonable grounds to believe that the LLC would be unable to pay its liabilities as they become due following the distribution.

We anticipate that Bermudian LLCs will feature in more transactions as the market continues to grow more accustomed to their use and features.

And, as more LLCs are formed in Bermuda, we expect that their flexibility and bespoke nature will be utilised to full effect.

Share
More publications
050-Insolvency-Restructuring-Grid-Image
13 Jul 2026

Bermuda: Restructuring & Insolvency

This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of Restructuring & Insolvency laws and regulations applicable in Bermuda.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
10 Jul 2026

It’s healthy to sometimes disagree with regulators

At some point, almost every regulated business will disagree with its regulator.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
8 Jul 2026

Bermuda Privacy Commissioner Signals Shift to Stronger PIPA Enforcement

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (PrivCom) has issued its first annual report since Bermuda's Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (PIPA) came fully into force, with the reports content signaling a transition from education and implementation to a stronger focus on enforcement.

Bermuda-1024x576-1
1 Jul 2026

A Forest for the Future

A first since the blight, the airport cedar forest is growing tall and standing strong.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
1 Jul 2026

Complied out of business

Firms are complying themselves out of business because compliance no longer matches the evolving sophistication of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA).

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

The long game: how Bermuda became the world’s life reinsurance capital

Ask a life insurer in New York, London or Tokyo where the liabilities behind their book ultimately sit and there is an increasingly good chance the answer is a 21-square-mile island in the North Atlantic.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

Record H1’26 Cat Bond Issuance Driven by Rising Sponsor Comfort and Diversified Risk

With H1 2026 officially breaking the record for the most catastrophe bond deals to come to market and settle in the first six months of the year, a key trend driving this momentum is how comfortable sponsors have become with the mechanics of the overall cat bond space. This familiarity has ultimately encouraged a wave of new sponsors to enter the market, according to Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Jun 2026

The Cost of Getting Employee Departures Wrong: Five Common Pitfalls for Bermuda Employers

Employee departures are an inevitable part of running a business, but the way they are managed can have significant legal, financial and operational consequences. In Bermuda, employers who approach terminations without adequate preparation may expose themselves to unnecessary disputes, regulatory issues, and reputational harm. Whether an employee is being dismissed for performance reasons, made redundant or departing as part of a negotiated exit, by recognizing the following common mistakes and taking a proactive approach, organizations can manage departures more effectively and reduce risk.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
8 Jun 2026

It’s time to bridge Pipa compliance gap

A review of 200 publicly available privacy notices of companies in Bermuda has revealed that just one in nine are fully compliant with the Personal Information Protection Act 2016.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
26 May 2026

Transparency is a legal requirement under Pipa

Major companies across the European Union have faced substantial fines between 2019 and 2024, estimated at a total of €930 million (about $1.08 billion), not only for cyberattacks or data breaches, but also for issues such as noncompliant privacy notices. A common theme in many cases has been a lack of transparency.