BMA releases guidance on outsourcing

Published: 21 Nov 2019
Type: Insight

First published in The Royal Gazette, Legally Speaking, November 2019

For many companies, outsourcing is essential in allowing them to cost effectively and efficiently provide their own services to clients.


However, there has been a growing appreciation by such companies of the potential risks involved when an organisation enters into such agreements and companies become heavily reliant on relationships with particular outsourcing service providers.

In recognition of the risks posed, and that outsourcing has increased considerably in Bermuda over the past three years, the Bermuda Monetary Authority has released new Guidance Notes on outsourcing for the benefit of “relevant licensed entities” (RLE).

In this context, the RLEs are banks, deposit companies, the Bermuda Stock Exchange, corporate service providers, trust companies, money service businesses, investment businesses, fund administrators, and the credit union licensed by the BMA.

Although the Guidance Notes apply to all outsourcing arrangements, the BMA is most concerned with those that are “material”, defined as those whereby failure in provision or performance of the activity would materially impact business operations, financial performance, ability to manage risk, or compliance with Bermuda laws and regulations.

The BMA has further narrowed the scope of the Guidance Notes by excluding the provision of auxiliary services that many companies outsource, i.e. those not integral to delivery of the company’s own services.

Examples include the provision of external legal advice, external training and security, and management and maintenance of the RLE’s premises. The definition also excludes the provision of standardised services such as office equipment, stationery or photocopying, which by their nature are unlikely to pose a significant risk.

The new guidelines will come into force on May 1, 2020. Prior to this, transition periods will operate. The first transition period is from October 1, 2019 to January 3, 2020. During this period RLEs will have two options regarding pre-existing outsourcing arrangements:

  • to seek prior approval from the BMA by submission of a complete and comprehensive application, demonstrating compliance with the Guidance Notes, for each material outsourcing arrangements the RLE identifies; or
  • the attestation route, which involves the CEO, or board-nominated senior executive, attesting that each material outsourcing arrangement entered into by the RLE complies fully with all aspects of the Guidance Notes. These attestations will then subsequently be verified by the BMA’s supervisory programme post-implementation.

The second transition period will run from January 4, 2020 to implementation of the Guidance Notes on May 1, 2020. During this period, where an RLE wishes to enter into a new material outsourcing arrangement it can use either the pre-approval or attestation routes.

Once implementation of the Guidance Notes has taken place, RLEs wishing to enter into new material outsourcing arrangements will be required to make prior notification submissions to the BMA.

The Guidance Notes make it clear that there is an expectation that RLEs wishing to enter into material outsourcing arrangements will have clear guidelines and policies for managing these arrangements.

In particular, the BMA expects that RLEs will be able to demonstrate that a risk evaluation process has been conducted that identifies not only the benefits of outsourcing but also risks and how these can be mitigated.

RLEs will also be expected to conduct appropriate due diligence on the outsourcing providers they have selected, including contingency plans should the service fail.

RLEs also need to consider whether the written agreement entered into adequately captures the terms of the arrangement and specifically addresses any issues identified during the risk evaluation and due diligence stages of the process.

Monitoring of the risks posed by outsourcing should also be an ongoing process and RLEs should be able to demonstrate that the level of monitoring is proportionate to the risks posed.

Prior to release of the Guidance Notes the BMA sought feedback from companies and industry bodies representing market participants. This feedback prompted the BMA to change its regulatory approach from that of “prior approval” to one of “prior notification”.

In adopting a prior notification approach, the BMA has reduced approval times from 60 days to 20 days. Applications will notify the BMA that the RLE intends on entering into a material outsourcing arrangement subject to no objection being made by the BMA within the 20 working day notification period.

This change addressed the concern expressed by RLEs that prior approval could potentially lead to costly delays and interruptions to businesses operating in Bermuda, potentially proving detrimental to competitiveness.

During the notification period the BMA can take several actions including requesting further information, effectively stopping the 20 working day clock, increasing the speed of response by agreeing to the outsourcing, or formally objecting to the proposed arrangement.

Following the release of the Guidance Notes RLEs should now have a much clearer understanding of the expectations that the BMA has regarding outsourcing relationships and of the steps necessary to obtain approval for both existing agreements and those entered into post-implementation.

These Guidance Notes may also have the additional benefit of assisting RLEs in identifying and applying additional scrutiny to outsourcing arrangements that pose systemic risk to their business.

Share
More publications
Bermuda-1024x576-1
1 Jul 2026

A Forest for the Future

A first since the blight, the airport cedar forest is growing tall and standing strong.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
1 Jul 2026

Complied out of business

Firms are complying themselves out of business because compliance no longer matches the evolving sophistication of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA).

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

The long game: how Bermuda became the world’s life reinsurance capital

Ask a life insurer in New York, London or Tokyo where the liabilities behind their book ultimately sit and there is an increasingly good chance the answer is a 21-square-mile island in the North Atlantic.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Jul 2026

Record H1’26 Cat Bond Issuance Driven by Rising Sponsor Comfort and Diversified Risk

With H1 2026 officially breaking the record for the most catastrophe bond deals to come to market and settle in the first six months of the year, a key trend driving this momentum is how comfortable sponsors have become with the mechanics of the overall cat bond space. This familiarity has ultimately encouraged a wave of new sponsors to enter the market, according to Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Jun 2026

The Cost of Getting Employee Departures Wrong: Five Common Pitfalls for Bermuda Employers

Employee departures are an inevitable part of running a business, but the way they are managed can have significant legal, financial and operational consequences. In Bermuda, employers who approach terminations without adequate preparation may expose themselves to unnecessary disputes, regulatory issues, and reputational harm. Whether an employee is being dismissed for performance reasons, made redundant or departing as part of a negotiated exit, by recognizing the following common mistakes and taking a proactive approach, organizations can manage departures more effectively and reduce risk.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
8 Jun 2026

It’s time to bridge Pipa compliance gap

A review of 200 publicly available privacy notices of companies in Bermuda has revealed that just one in nine are fully compliant with the Personal Information Protection Act 2016.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
26 May 2026

Transparency is a legal requirement under Pipa

Major companies across the European Union have faced substantial fines between 2019 and 2024, estimated at a total of €930 million (about $1.08 billion), not only for cyberattacks or data breaches, but also for issues such as noncompliant privacy notices. A common theme in many cases has been a lack of transparency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 May 2026

Outsourcing considerations for Bermuda insurers

As Bermuda insurers engage with third-party service providers to support their business functions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority has clarified its regulatory expectations surrounding outsourcing arrangements and operational resilience.

Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.