Beneficial Ownership Registration in Bermuda, The British Virgin Islands and Cayman Islands

Published: 27 Jun 2018
Type: Insight

The beneficial ownership registration regime has gone live in Bermuda, The British Virgin Islands (BVI) and Cayman Islands. We set out below the current status of the regime in each of these jurisdictions.


Bermuda

As of 23 March 2018 all Bermuda companies and limited liability companies (LLC), except those that are expressly exempted from the requirement, must establish and maintain a beneficial ownership register at their registered offices (or, with the Registrar of Companies’ permission, a place in Bermuda convenient for inspection by the Registrar of Companies). The law provides for a transition period of six months, meaning that such entities have until 23 September 2018 to comply.

Entities that are exempted from the requirement to establish and maintain a beneficial ownership register include those whose shares are listed on the Bermuda Stock Exchange, or other appointed stock exchange; certain financial institutions (including those licensed under Sections 4 or 10 of the Insurance Act 1978 (insurers, insurance managers and intermediaries)); permit companies and certain entities operating close-ended investment funds.

The beneficial ownership register must include minimum required information in respect of every registrable person. A registrable person means a beneficial owner or relevant legal entity.

A beneficial owner is an individual (or individuals) who owns or controls more than 25% of the shares, voting rights or interests in a company through direct or indirect ownership or, failing that, an individual who has control over the company or LLC as applicable by other means. Where neither applies, the individual who holds the position of senior manager of the company or LLC as applicable is considered to be the beneficial owner. The key is to note that the threshold of share ownership is more than 25%, not at 25%.

A relevant legal entity is any legal entity or legal arrangement that would be a beneficial owner if it were an individual.

This information must also be filed with the Bermuda Monetary Authority but is not publically available.

Similar obligations have been placed on Bermuda partnerships, exempted partnerships and limited partnership as of 23 March 2018. Again, the law provides for a transition period of six months, meaning that such entities have until 23 September 2018 to comply.

British Virgin Islands

The BVI beneficial ownership registration regime applies to companies incorporated or registered under the BVI Business Companies Act, 2004; but not foreign companies registered in BVI. The definition of a beneficial owner is similar to that in relation to Bermuda with an ownership threshold of more than 25%.

If a company is in scope and not exempted, it is required to identify its beneficial owners and registrable legal entities, and provide prescribed information on them to the registered agent (RA). The RA is required to maintain the information required under the Beneficial Ownership Secure Search System Act, 2017 (BOSS Act) in the RA’s dedicated database for at least five years (a) following the dissolution of the company; or (b) after the company ceases to be a “corporate and legal entity” within the meaning of the BOSS Act.

The “Beneficial Ownership Secure Search” system is not public. It is accessible only by a “designated person” (to be designated by Order of the Minister responsible for Finance).

Cayman Islands

Cayman companies, segregated portfolio companies and limited liability companies that are not exempted from the registration regime are required to maintain a register of beneficial ownership. This register is maintained at the registered office, and its contents are regularly copied to a secure centralised technological platform. The definition of a beneficial owner is broadly similar to that of Bermuda and the BVI.

Entities that are listed on the Cayman Islands Stock Exchange or on an approved stock exchange are exempted, as are companies registered or licensed under a regulatory law (e.g. regulated funds under the Mutual Funds Law). In addition, certain companies which are managed, arranged, administered or promoted by an entity that is regulated or listed in Cayman or an approved jurisdiction, where the company is a special purpose company, a private equity or collective investment scheme or an investment fund (or the fund’s general partner where it is an exempted limited partnership) are also exempt.

As a result of amendments passed in December, 2017, any company that claims an exemption from the regime must provide its corporate service provider with written confirmation of the exemption.

The centralised technological platform was rolled out on 1 July 2017 but a grace period of one year was provided to allow companies to complete their registers. The grace period expires on 30 June 2018. Out-of-scope companies also have the same deadline to file their exemption form.

The platform is not public. It is accessible only by the competent authority, being the Minister charged with responsibility for Financial Services, either acting alone or through a person designated by the Minister to act for a specific purpose.

Watch this space

Developments around the beneficial ownership registration regimes in these offshore jurisdictions clearly are of significant importance in Asia. Note however, that companies listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange are currently exempt from such requirements.

On 23 May 2018, Royal assent was given to the UK’s Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2018, which requires the British Overseas Territories (but not the Crown Dependencies) to make their beneficial owner registries public by the end of 2020. It remains to be seen what steps the British Overseas Territories such as Bermuda, Cayman and the BVI will take in response to this unprecedented action.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
28 Oct 2025

Updates on Hong Kong’s Uncertificated Securities Market Regime from an offshore perspective

Hong Kong’s uncertificated securities market ("USM”) initiative is scheduled to take effect in 2026, subject to market readiness.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
21 Oct 2025

Redemption of Cayman shares in Chinese Red Chip corporate groups – latest developments and ideas for investors

This article provides an overview of the key legal issues facing preference shareholders in Cayman Islands companies when considering enforcing their redemption rights.

Appleby-Website-Structured-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
26 Sep 2025

Structured lending for hyperscale data center providers: offshore spvs powering securitisation driven capital solutions

The exponential growth of hyperscale data centers, driven by surging demand for cloud computing, artificial intelligence and digital infrastructure, is reshaping the way these assets are financed. As operators seek to scale rapidly, bank debt funding is moving towards capital markets solutions. Securitisation, particularly in Asia, is emerging as a strategic tool to monetise long-term lease receivables, with offshore SPVs playing a pivotal role in enabling cross-border capital flows.

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
25 Sep 2025

Typical Collateral Package in Cayman Fund Financing

The recovery of the Asian fund finance market over the past couple of years has reinforced the dominance of the Cayman Islands as the jurisdiction of choice for offshore fund structures.  The security package remains a key consideration for lenders in fund finance transactions.  This article provides an overview of the main types of collateral that lenders typically seek when lending to Cayman Islands fund vehicles under different types of facilities.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
21 Aug 2025

Hong Kong and Australian courts recognise principles of segregation in Cayman SPCs

In two recent judgments, Tjin Joen Joe, Andy Tsjoe Kong and another v Oakwise Value Fund SPC [2025] HKCFI 1281 (Oakwise Value Fund) and Cowan, in the matter of Coinful Capital Fund, SPC (in Official Liquidation) [2025] FCA 315 (Coinful Capital Fund), the High Court of Hong Kong and the Federal Court of Australia have recognised fundamental principles underpinning the Cayman Islands segregated portfolio companies (SPC) regime.

Dispute Resolution
28 Jun 2025

High Court of Hong Kong confirms arbitrability of shareholder claims for oppression and loss of confidence

In the recent decision in PI 1 & PI 2 v MR [2025] HKCFI 1110 (PI 1 & PI 2), the High Court of Hong Kong confirmed that certain factual and legal disputes are arbitrable, even where their determination may serve as a precursor to the winding up of a Cayman Islands company on just and equitable grounds. Notably, the High Court of Hong Kong has, for the first time, expressly adopted the reasoning of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (the JCPC) in FamilyMart China Holdings Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp [2023] UKPC 33; [2024] Bus LR 190 (FamilyMart).

Appleby-Website-Funds-and-Investment-Services
26 Jun 2025

Navigating CIMA Audit Requirements for a Cayman Regulated Fund

To maintain good standing with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA), a Cayman regulated mutual fund or a registered private fund must meet specific audit filing obligations. These requirements are critical for funds seeking to remain compliant or deregister. This article outlines a complete set of audit filing scenarios for Cayman regulated funds as well as its statutory audit filing requirements, including audit waivers, audit filing extensions, and audit period extensions. This article is to address some of the key issues facing fund operators in the operation, management and orderly winding up of the Cayman regulated funds when it comes to audit filings.

Corporate Finance
25 Jun 2025

The Rise of Panda Bonds: Enhancing International Investments in China's Bond Market from an Offshore Perspective

Panda bonds, initially launched in 2005, saw unprecedented popularity in recent years. This surge is likely driven by factors such as the divergence in the United States (“U.S.”) - China monetary policy and ongoing geopolitical tensions. Panda bonds - renminbi (“RMB”) denominated bonds issued within China's domestic bond market by entities domiciled outside of China - serve as a strategic financing tool. Issuers range from Chinese-owned companies incorporated in offshore financial centers with primary operations in China to international corporations, financial institutions and sovereign entities.

Structured Finance
18 Jun 2025

Achieving Bankruptcy Remoteness in Structured Finance

The structured finance market in the APAC region continues to grow in recent years, particular in the number of new issuances and the use of different financial products in complex structuring. Cayman special purpose vehicles (SPVs) are one of the most utilized offshore vehicles in the Asian structured finance industry, which is well supported by established legal and regulatory regimes. This article introduces a key feature of securitisation and repackaging, which is the ring-fencing of assets and removing them from the bankruptcy risks of the originator/seller of the assets – often referred to as bankruptcy remoteness. Investors of structured notes can simply take on the credit risks of the underlying asset, and the seller can achieve off-balance sheet treatment of the underlying asset.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
10 Apr 2025

Cayman Court Grants Convening Order, Marking Key Step in Kaisa’s Recovery Plan

Distressed Chinese property developer Kaisa takes step forward in its recovery, as Cayman Courts continue to demonstrate the jurisdiction’s pro-active approach to cross-border restructurings. Though the Court’s approach to a scheme convening hearing is well-established, challenges from a small section of creditors remain a risk that cannot be ignored. What are the key factors in navigating the restructuring process, and what trends should we keep an eye on?