Non-disclosure agreements in employment contracts – do employers really need them? (Part 1)

Published: 5 Nov 2018
Type: Insight

First published in The Bermuda Chamber Of Commerce Newsletter (Chamber Insider) November 2018

Recent high profile scandals reported in the media from Harvey Weinstein and the #MeToo movement to disclosures made under UK Parliamentary privilege about the British retailer Sir Philip Green have brought into focus the appropriateness of using such agreements, and whether the party seeking to rely upon them really need them. In this climate the mere use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) can sometimes carry reputational damage.

The use in a workplace context of NDAs used to be relatively unusual. In Bermuda, as in the rest of the common law world, even if there is not an express contractual clause of confidentiality in an employee’s contract of employment, this term will be implied.  However, it has now become standard practice for many employees to include wide-ranging NDAs in employment contracts and settlement agreements.

Typically, confidentiality clauses in employment contracts cover technical and client information acquired during employment, although some go much further. Similar provisions in settlement agreements often cover the existence and terms of the agreement as well as the circumstances surrounding the termination of employment, including any allegations made during employment, including in relation to sexual harassment or other alleged wrongdoing.

It is important to note that an NDA cannot be used to prevent an employee from making a disclosure for the purposes of Bermuda’s whistleblowing legislation or to report criminal conduct, and any agreement that purports to do so will be void. Further, where an individual is obliged by law to disclose information, i.e. where they are required to give evidence in a court case or to a tax inspector, that disclosure will not breach the terms of the NDA. For this reason, it is vital to ensure that there are appropriately worded ‘carve-outs’ for lawful disclosures within the NDA.

This is not to say that an NDA should never be used; sometimes their use will be vitally important to protect the reputation, confidentiality and sensitive information of the business. Before asking an employee to sign an NDA, employers should carefully consider whether this type of agreement is actually required, and if so, including whether the agreement goes no further than reasonably necessary to protect the employer’s interests.

The alternative for the prudent employer is to consider improving the general confidentiality clause in an employment contract or settlement, which can be made more or less demanding depending on the seniority of the employee, and without the draconian total ‘gagging’ effect of some NDAs. It can also be crafted to ensure that the maintenance of confidentiality and the return of confidential information post termination.  The issues to be considered when drafting the right confidentiality clause for a particular business and seniority of employee will be considered in part 2.

This note is intended as a high level overview of this topic. Legal advice should always be sought on a case by case basis.

Share
More publications
Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.

Website-Code-Bermuda-1
10 Apr 2026

Bermuda Regulatory Update – Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026

On 31 March 2026, the Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026 and the Economic Substance Amendment Regulations 2026 (together, the “2026 Amendments”) came into force, enacting changes to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (“ES Act”) and Economic Substance Regulations 2018.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
10 Apr 2026

Digital asset developments and Bermuda’s regulatory readiness

While frightening to some, “finance bros” and “tech bros” are now wearing the same gilets as traditional finance products and structures are being infused with digital asset adaptation.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2026

Navigating Bermuda’s New Recovery Planning Requirements: A Roadmap for Commercial Insurers

On 20 March 2026, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) issued an updated Guidance Note for Recovery Planning Requirements (Guidance Note). The Guidance Note assists Bermuda commercial insurers’ compliance with the obligations set out in the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Recovery Plan) Rules 2024 (Rules), which became operative on 1 May 2025.