Weathering the Latest Storm in the Crypto Winter

Published: 21 Nov 2022
Type: Insight

For investment funds lawyers who have been in the industry for a long time, the extreme stresses in global financial markets and the banking system that occurred between mid-2007 and early 2009 (now commonly referred to as the “global financial crisis”) now seem like a distant memory. However, recent events in the cryptocurrency space might mean that some of the experience gained, and lessons learned, during that period may become very useful again over the coming weeks and months.

The establishment of offshore investment funds to invest into cryptocurrency has been a very active area over the last couple of years, and there are now many offshore funds operating in this space. The US bankruptcy filings in respect of FTX, made on 11 November 2022, have resulted in the assets of one of the largest crypto exchanges by volume, with possibly over one million users, being frozen.

The directors of funds that were utilizing this exchange, and their investment managers, now have to rapidly consider the implications.

The possibility that other exchanges and/or counterparties in the digital assets space may become subject to a contagion effect may mean that the requirement to undertake such considerations may soon spread to an even broader number of investment funds.

When considering a fund’s options, it will be necessary to ensure a complete understanding of the fund’s powers under its offering document and in its articles of association (or other constitutional documents). In addition, it will be necessary to be fully cognizant of any side letters purporting to provide differential rights to any particular investors.

Depending on the percentage of the fund’s overall assets that have become illiquid, various paths forward may be applicable.

If the fund should be able to survive, consideration would still need to be given to whether it remains possible for the fund to reliably undertake the valuation of its assets (i.e. determine the net asset value or “NAV”) and also to managing the liquidity rights of investors in the face of potentially significant redemption requests.

As noted above, the provisions of the fund’s documentation will become critical to determine whether mechanics for various mitigation strategies are drafted in. Some examples of the possible mechanics that might be used to limit investors ability to redeem from the fund include the suspension of the determination of NAV and/or redemptions, the suspension of the payment of redemption proceeds or the use of redemption “gates”.

Another approach that may be available for consideration is the use of “side pockets”, if the fund’s documentation provides for this. If the documents do not expressly allow for such side pockets then a similar outcome can be achieved by utilizing an ability to make distribution of assets in kind. This ability can be utilized to undertake a “synthetic side pocket” strategy which involves the creation of a newly formed special-purpose vehicle (SPV) by the fund, the contribution of assets to that SPV by the fund, and distribution of the SPV shares to the fund’s investors.

If it is determined that the fund is not going to survive, but remains solvent, the method of implementing an orderly winding down needs to be considered. This could be implemented merely by the compulsory redemption of all investors, whilst the fund’s board of directors remain in control, or it could be implemented by placing the fund into voluntary liquidation and appointing a third-party liquidator to conduct the winding down. There are advantages and disadvantages to each approach and the most appropriate course will be dependent on the specific facts in any instance.

If the fund is potentially insolvent, the approaches that need to be contemplated become a little more specific to the offshore jurisdiction in which the fund is domiciled but, broadly speaking, the winding up will become a Court supervised process, requiring specialist litigation and insolvency expertise. These various Court processes generally give the fund the benefit of a statutory moratorium against legal claims.

Throughout all of this, it will be necessary to ensure appropriate communication of relevant information between the fund’s directors, the investment manager and the fund’s investors.

As can be seen, there is a lot to consider and sometimes all of this must be done under stress and on an expedited timeline. Fund directors and investor managers facing the sorts of issues contemplated by this memorandum should be proactive, and seek professional advice as soon as possible.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
21 Oct 2025

Redemption of Cayman shares in Chinese Red Chip corporate groups – latest developments and ideas for investors

This article provides an overview of the key legal issues facing preference shareholders in Cayman Islands companies when considering enforcing their redemption rights.

Corporate Finance
25 Jun 2025

The Rise of Panda Bonds: Enhancing International Investments in China's Bond Market from an Offshore Perspective

Panda bonds, initially launched in 2005, saw unprecedented popularity in recent years. This surge is likely driven by factors such as the divergence in the United States (“U.S.”) - China monetary policy and ongoing geopolitical tensions. Panda bonds - renminbi (“RMB”) denominated bonds issued within China's domestic bond market by entities domiciled outside of China - serve as a strategic financing tool. Issuers range from Chinese-owned companies incorporated in offshore financial centers with primary operations in China to international corporations, financial institutions and sovereign entities.

IWD Grid Capture
8 Mar 2025

International Women’s Day 2025 roundtable: Rights. Equality. Empowerment.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

The Grand Court clarifies the ordinary rule for damages in temporary deprivation of property cases
29 Apr 2024

Cayman Islands Grand Court Orders Disclosure Despite PRC Data Security Law Concerns

The Cayman Islands Grand Court has recently ordered disclosure of documents in on-going court proceedings despite arguments that disclosure would breach the PRC’s Data Security Law.

Corporate Restructuring
10 Jul 2023

A Bird’s-eye View of Some Key Restructuring Options and Processes in Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands

This article focuses on restructuring options and processes only, and will merely touch on formal insolvency where it is intended to aid a restructuring process.

Fund Finance
10 Jul 2023

Quick Glance at ESG Trends in Fund Financing

There is little doubt that ESG will continue to grow in fund financing, and we will expect relevant regulations and guidelines to be refined and market norms and practices to be developed. 

Private Client Trusts
3 Feb 2023

Beneficial Ownership Registers: An Update

On 22 November 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union declared that the provision of the EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive, whereby Member States must ensure that the information on the beneficial ownership of corporate entities incorporated within their territory is accessible in all cases to any member of the general public, is invalid.

Funds & Investment Services
3 Feb 2023

Offshore Private Funds and Offshore Managers: Divergent Regimes in the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands

Consideration should be given and appropriate advice should be sought as to what would be the most appropriate jurisdiction for the formation of any particular structure in its specific circumstances, in order to make the best use of any available regulatory arbitrage opportunities.

Dispute Resolution
3 Feb 2023

Will the amendments to the BVI Business Companies Act assist litigants?

The BVI Business Companies (Amendment) Act, 2022 and the BVI Business Companies (Amendment) Regulations, 2022, gazetted by the BVI Government on 12 August 2022, came into force on 1 January 2023.