Segregated account companies in Bermuda

Published: 1 Feb 2018
Type: Insight

A company incorporated in Bermuda or to which the Companies Act 1981 otherwise applies, can apply to be registered under the Segregated Accounts Companies Act 2000 (Act).


A segregated accounts company (SAC) is able to hold certain assets and liabilities in a separate account firewalled from the assets and liabilities of the SAC itself (the SAC’s own account is usually referred to as the “general account”) and the assets belonging to its other segregated accounts.

In order for a company to achieve legal separation of its general account and its segregated account(s) it must be registered as an SAC with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) in Bermuda and comply with all relevant laws and regulations governing the operation of an SAC.

Uses of a segregated accounts company

SACs are commonly used in the insurance sector, for special purpose vehicles, and in the areas of financial guarantees, and securitisation & derivatives structures.

The Act is the principal legislation governing SACs in Bermuda, however, an SAC must also comply with other legislation applicable to its structure, for example the Companies Act 1981 and/or the Insurance Act 1978.

Documentation and contracts entered into by an SAC are often governed by the laws of a jurisdiction other than Bermuda. In this situation, a bi-location governing law clause should be added that ensures any aspects of the document dealing with the segregated account nature of the SAC are governed by Bermuda law and the Act.

segregated accounts company registration

To register as an SAC, a company must apply to the ROC. If the company is engaged in insurance business (as defined in the Insurance Act 1978) then the company may proceed direct to application to the ROC. If it carries on business other than insurance business, it must first obtain approval from the Minister of Finance (Minister).

If the company has conducted business prior to its application to become an SAC then, unless the Minister directs otherwise, the application must be accompanied by a statutory declaration of the company directors setting out, among other things, a true and accurate statement or description of the assets and liabilities of the company and any pending material transactions. Unless the Minister directs otherwise, the creditors of the company must be notified of the application and the directors’ statutory declaration must either confirm that no creditor will be prejudiced or confirm that the creditors of the company have consented to or been given adequate notice of the registration of the company as an SAC.

The ROC may impose conditions on the registration of the company and can require that the company use the abbreviation (SAC) in its name after registration.

In addition to its annual reporting obligations and compliance requirements under the Companies Act 1981 and any other relevant legislation (e.g. Insurance Act 1978, Bribery Act 2016) the Act provides that an SAC must comply with other requirements, including:

  • Appointing and maintaining in office a resident representative. The resident representative must be approved by the Minister and has reporting obligations under which he must make written reports to the ROC on the happening of certain events, e.g. insolvency, breach of the Act or involvement in criminal proceedings;
  • Maintaining records of the assets and liabilities of each segregated account as well as the general account and preparing financial statements in respect of each segregated account;
  • Maintaining a register of account owners, including particulars of their interest in the particular segregated account; and
  • Ensuring that third parties that have dealings with it are aware that they are dealing with an SAC. This includes a requirement to inform third parties that they are dealing with an SAC and to include reference to the fact it is an SAC on its letterhead and contracts.

The ROC can remove a company from the register of SAC companies thus causing it to cease holding such status. If a company wishes to cease being an SAC it must submit a written request to the ROC.

An SAC provides companies with an alternative to the cumbersome group structure that is traditionally used to protect assets from risks associated with other aspects of the business. The SAC structure is more flexible and can be less expensive to set up and maintain.

However, there are risks associated with utilising an SAC. Not all jurisdictions have legislation in force that corresponds to the Act, and so there is a risk that the Act may not be upheld or recognised in jurisdictions other than Bermuda.

A slight variant on the SAC, the incorporated segregated accounts company (ISAC) would be an entirely new type of entity adopting aspects of the traditional limited company and SACs. Not in existence in Bermuda, it is envisaged that an ISAC structure would afford each segregated account separate legal personality, a key change from the current model.

During his Speech from the Throne on September 8, 2017, Governor John Rankin confirmed that Government will draft, table and pass such ISAC legislation as is required to ensure that Bermuda’s hard-won reputation in markets such as the captive insurance market, is preserved and maintained.

What are the advantages of a segregated accounts company?

A segregated accounts company provides companies with an alternative to the cumbersome group structure that is traditionally used to protect assets from risks associated with other aspects of the business. The SAC structure is more flexible and can be less expensive to set up and maintain.

First published in The Royal Gazette, January 2018

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Jun 2026

The Cost of Getting Employee Departures Wrong: Five Common Pitfalls for Bermuda Employers

Employee departures are an inevitable part of running a business, but the way they are managed can have significant legal, financial and operational consequences. In Bermuda, employers who approach terminations without adequate preparation may expose themselves to unnecessary disputes, regulatory issues, and reputational harm. Whether an employee is being dismissed for performance reasons, made redundant or departing as part of a negotiated exit, by recognizing the following common mistakes and taking a proactive approach, organizations can manage departures more effectively and reduce risk.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
8 Jun 2026

It’s time to bridge Pipa compliance gap

A review of 200 publicly available privacy notices of companies in Bermuda has revealed that just one in nine are fully compliant with the Personal Information Protection Act 2016.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
26 May 2026

Transparency is a legal requirement under Pipa

Major companies across the European Union have faced substantial fines between 2019 and 2024, estimated at a total of €930 million (about $1.08 billion), not only for cyberattacks or data breaches, but also for issues such as noncompliant privacy notices. A common theme in many cases has been a lack of transparency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 May 2026

Outsourcing considerations for Bermuda insurers

As Bermuda insurers engage with third-party service providers to support their business functions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority has clarified its regulatory expectations surrounding outsourcing arrangements and operational resilience.

Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.

Website-Code-Bermuda-1
10 Apr 2026

Bermuda Regulatory Update – Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026

On 31 March 2026, the Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026 and the Economic Substance Amendment Regulations 2026 (together, the “2026 Amendments”) came into force, enacting changes to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (“ES Act”) and Economic Substance Regulations 2018.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
10 Apr 2026

Digital asset developments and Bermuda’s regulatory readiness

While frightening to some, “finance bros” and “tech bros” are now wearing the same gilets as traditional finance products and structures are being infused with digital asset adaptation.