The following examples may sound familiar, as they were widely reported on:

  • In 2013, PR Officer Justine Sacco tweeted “Going to Africa. Hope I don’t get AIDS. Just kidding. I’m white.” She then boarded an 11 hour flight to South Africa and by the time she landed her tweet had ‘gone viral’ and the company she worked for soon after released a statement confirming that it had “parted ways” with Ms. Sacco¹.
  • In 2016, a Registered Nurse in Saskatchewan, Canada named Carolyn Strom was disciplined by the local Registered Nurses’ Association after being found guilty of professional misconduct after making a critical Facebook post. The Facebook post criticized a care home where the nurse’s grandfather was cared for. The issue was not that the nurse had vented her frustration, but it was how she did it. By posting the criticism on Facebook, changing the settings of the post so it was accessible by anyone and then tweeting a link to the post, the nurse had brought the entire profession in for criticism without first exhausting proper complaint procedures. The nurse was suspended from practice and fined USD26,000 (USD25,000 of which was towards the legal fees stemming from her unsuccessfully challenging the decision)².
  • In 2019, radio personality Danny Baker was fired by the BBC over an alleged racist tweet of a photo with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their new baby. The image was of the couple holding hands with a suited chimpanzee with the caption: “Royal Baby leaves hospital.” He was fired the next day³.

These are just a few examples where employers took steps to discipline employees for off-duty social media conduct wherein the employer’s reputation was, by implication, put at risk. A common theme we find where we have advised on similar cases is that employees often do not know that what they say via their social media accounts may be held against them with their employer.

In Bermuda, the Employment Act 2000 speaks to employees being liable for termination if the serious misconduct has a detrimental effect on the employer’s business4. This would include a detrimental effect on an employer’s reputation.

Most employment contracts include the standard provision that an employee should not do anything that would bring the employer’s reputation into disrepute. However, we strongly encourage employers to update any policies to include specific guidance on social media and to make it clear to employees that what they tweet/post could cost them their job.

Locations

Bermuda

Services

Dispute Resolution

Type

Insight

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
22 Sep 2023

Reinsurance Strategies in a Hard Market

The extent to which improved market conditions for reinsurers will endure and the importance of main...

22 Sep 2023

Bermuda’s Catastrophe Bond Market Is Enjoying A Record Year

Bermuda’s catastrophe bond market is enjoying a record year, but Bermuda Managing Partner Brad Add...

7 Sep 2023

Bermuda Captives: Reps and Warranties Coverage

The Bermuda captive market is seeing increasing interest in representations and warranty coverage.

16 Aug 2023

In The Spotlight: Bermuda’s Vanessa Schrum

Francesca Ffiske of Private Client Global Elite sat down with Vanessa Schrum from Appleby in Bermuda...

27 Jul 2023

Tech Innovation Financing Alternative

Creators of technology, whether financial services software, biotechnology, data analytics solutions...

12 Jul 2023

Thought Leaders – Commercial Litigation 2023 Q&A

Read John's Q&A with Who's Who Legal.

6 Jul 2023

Employers, employees and PIPA

Now that a date has been set for the coming into force of the Personal Information Protection Act 20...

3 Jul 2023

Pricing Still Not Where It Needs To Be

In spite of climate impacts and some large insurers pulling out of certain markets, there’s been s...

29 Jun 2023

Bermuda’s Pragmatic Regulations

Increasingly, onshore and offshore jurisdictions alike seek to ensure that international business is...