The following examples may sound familiar, as they were widely reported on:

  • In 2013, PR Officer Justine Sacco tweeted “Going to Africa. Hope I don’t get AIDS. Just kidding. I’m white.” She then boarded an 11 hour flight to South Africa and by the time she landed her tweet had ‘gone viral’ and the company she worked for soon after released a statement confirming that it had “parted ways” with Ms. Sacco¹.
  • In 2016, a Registered Nurse in Saskatchewan, Canada named Carolyn Strom was disciplined by the local Registered Nurses’ Association after being found guilty of professional misconduct after making a critical Facebook post. The Facebook post criticized a care home where the nurse’s grandfather was cared for. The issue was not that the nurse had vented her frustration, but it was how she did it. By posting the criticism on Facebook, changing the settings of the post so it was accessible by anyone and then tweeting a link to the post, the nurse had brought the entire profession in for criticism without first exhausting proper complaint procedures. The nurse was suspended from practice and fined USD26,000 (USD25,000 of which was towards the legal fees stemming from her unsuccessfully challenging the decision)².
  • In 2019, radio personality Danny Baker was fired by the BBC over an alleged racist tweet of a photo with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their new baby. The image was of the couple holding hands with a suited chimpanzee with the caption: “Royal Baby leaves hospital.” He was fired the next day³.

These are just a few examples where employers took steps to discipline employees for off-duty social media conduct wherein the employer’s reputation was, by implication, put at risk. A common theme we find where we have advised on similar cases is that employees often do not know that what they say via their social media accounts may be held against them with their employer.

In Bermuda, the Employment Act 2000 speaks to employees being liable for termination if the serious misconduct has a detrimental effect on the employer’s business4. This would include a detrimental effect on an employer’s reputation.

Most employment contracts include the standard provision that an employee should not do anything that would bring the employer’s reputation into disrepute. However, we strongly encourage employers to update any policies to include specific guidance on social media and to make it clear to employees that what they tweet/post could cost them their job.

Type

Insight

Locations

Bermuda

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
26 Feb 2021 |

Changes to the Employment Act 2000 – Part 3

This Article is Part 3 of our series on the amendments to the Bermuda employment and labour legislat...

25 Feb 2021 |

Acquisition agreements during Covid-19

Given the ongoing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, it is timely for us to look closely at material a...

11 Feb 2021 |

New labour law tackles bullying and harassment

A Bill recently passed in the Senate will introduce important changes to the Employment Act 2000 (...

10 Feb 2021 |

Chambers Insurance & Reinsurance Guide 2021: Bermuda

This guide provides the latest information on sources of insurance and reinsurance law, insurance an...

29 Jan 2021 |

Changes to the Employment Act 2000 – Part 2

This is the second in our series of articles looking at upcoming changes to the Employment Act 2000 ...

25 Jan 2021 |

Appleby Bermuda contributes to Private Trust Companies handbook

Appleby have contributed to a new publication titled “Private Trust Companies: A Handbook for Advi...

7 Jan 2021 |

Employment Act 2000: Government Bill Proposes Significant Overhaul – Part 1

At the end of November 2020 the Government tabled various bills in the House of Assembly that will, ...