Mauritius: Regulatory Sandbox Licence

Published: 27 Mar 2019
Type: Insight

The Regulatory Sandbox Licence (RSL) was introduced to the Mauritian business landscape by the National Budget 2018/2019 which provided for the setting up of a National Regulatory Sandbox Licence Committee under the purview of the Financial Services Commission of Mauritius (FSC), regulator of non-financial and global business services.


Objective of the National Regulatory Sandbox Licence Committee (NRSL Committee)

The NSRL Committee has been attributed with the following functions:

coordinate the processing of RSL applications submitted to the Economic Development Board (EDB) in relation to FinTech activities;

act as the central point to evaluate Fintech applications which require RSL and that are lodged with EDB as well as all newly announced applications under the National Budget 2018/2019; and

allocate the supervisory function of the RSL Licensee either to the Bank of Mauritius or the FSC, subject to the nature of the Fintech activity.

Eligibility

In order to be eligible, applicants should meet the following criteria:

invest in an innovative project;

promote a project in respect of which there is either no legal framework or a lack of adequate legislative framework

establish the innovative nature of the proposed activity at the local, regional and international levels.

Documents to be submitted:

duly completed application form;

Business Plan or feasibility study outlining proposed business activity;

Particulars of promoters, beneficial owners and directors;

Certificate of character of beneficial owners and directors;

Financial forecast and financial capacities of applicant;

Details regarding the lack of regulatory framework in the country in relation to the conduct of the proposed activity;

Details regarding the known risks associated with the proposed activity;

Information on whether the applicant is licensed in any other jurisdiction for the proposed activity; and

An exit strategy to be implemented by the applicant in the event that the proposed activity is not implemented.

Successful Applications

An applicant is entitled to to commence his RSL activity and develop the project within a controlled environment as soon as it is notified of the EDB’s acceptance of the application. The development of the RSL activity remains of course subject to licensing conditions that may be imposed.

Furthermore, a licensee will be requested to submit what are known as interim and final reports.

Rejected Applications

The NRSL Committee has discretion to recommend that the EDB should turn down an application on the grounds that the proposed activity is not suitable for the Mauritian jurisdiction or because it may cause prejudice to the country’s good reputation. In the event that the EDB effectively turns down an application the applicant is notified in writing with reasons for the rejection.

Revocation/Suspension of License

The NRSL Committee and the EDB may, revoke or suspend a RSL in the following circumstances:

a licensee has failed to start operations of the proposed activity within 3 months;

the licensee has breached its RSL;

a licensee is conducting business in an unsound manner;

a licensee is failing to ensure risk control.

Conclusion

The introduction of the Regulatory Sandbox Licence to the Mauritian business landscape undoubtedly marks the ambition of Mauritius to position itself as a serious and innovative nation in the pursuit of establishing itself as a reputable financial centre as well as an international hub for blockchain start-ups.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Financial-Services
8 Oct 2025

Enforcing Integrity: The UK’s Legal Arsenal Against Market Abuse

The legal concept of market abuse and the twin concept of upholding market integrity are not new as these were prevalent since the 17th century ¹. As a matter of fact, there is a belief that insider dealing was the root cause of demise of the South Sea Company in the 18th century.

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
9 Sep 2025

Dual Remedies Afforded against the Granting of Injunctions

Actis Consumer Grooming Products Ltd v Super-Max Mauritius [2025 SCJ 388]

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
27 Aug 2025

The Mauritian National Budget 2025/2026 - From abyss to prosperity: Rebuilding the bridge to future

On 05 June 2025, Dr Navinchandra Ramgoolam GCSK, FRCP, Prime Minister of Mauritius, in his capacity as Minister of Finance (Minister of Finance) tabled the National Budget for the fiscal year 2025-2026 under the theme “From Abyss to Prosperity: Rebuilding the Bridge to the Future”.

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution
18 Aug 2025

Mauritius as an Ideal Seat for Arbitration

In one of its recent determinations, the Mauritian Supreme Court re-affirmed a line of decisions which confirmed its support to arbitration, whether international or domestic. These determinations reflect its understanding of the needs of business community, characterised by a marked choice to resolve disputes through a private mechanism to allow existing business relationships to thrive.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
25 Jul 2025

Insider Dealing: A Review of the Treatment in Mauritius, EU and US Federal law

A review of the treatment in Mauritius, the United States and the European Union of the offence of insider trading confirms the contrasting approaches which these jurisdictions have adopted on the issue even though all three jurisdictions share two fundamental concerns namely, (i) the prohibition on an insider to take an unfair advantage by reason of information which he has obtained to the detriment of third parties who are unaware of such information and, (ii) the protection of the integrity of financial markets and investor confidence ¹.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
20 Jun 2025

Professional emails are personal data

Case Commentary – France, Cour de cassation, 18 June 2025, 23-19.022 Professional emails are personal data.

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
11 Jun 2025

Are our Courts tilting towards procedural flexibility?

Case Commentary: R.K.G FRUITS CO LTD v MAERSK (MAURITIUS) LIMITED 2025 SCJ 220. In a significant decision reaffirming the principle that procedural technicalities should not override substantive justice, the Court of Civil Appeal allowed an appeal overturning an interlocutory judgment of the Bankruptcy Division that had dismissed an application to set aside a statutory demand on the basis of a contested board resolution.

Appleby-Website-Technology-and-Innovation
19 Mar 2025

Is Cryptocurrency security - the Mauritian and USA perspectives?

As any of the emerging technologies, cryptocurrency has been disruptive to the market and has challenged regulators globally. Unsurprisingly, it has been commented that “a little more than a decade ago, cryptocurrencies were essentially an academic concept. The idea seemed far-fetched to most people. But that all changed in 2009 with the creation of Bitcoin …/… [today] the world’s cryptocurrency market is worth more than USD 3 trillion …/… there’s no question that crypto is here to stay, and it will undoubtedly continue to disrupt countless industries ”.

IWD Grid Capture
8 Mar 2025

International Women’s Day 2025 roundtable: Rights. Equality. Empowerment.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
28 Jan 2025

Case Commentary: Mulliez H.S.B v Telecel Group SA & Anor 2025 SCJ 31

On 22 January 2025, the full bench of the Court of Civil Appeal in the matter of Mulliez H.S.B v Telecel Group SA & Anor 2025 SCJ 31 decided on the scope of Section 6 of the Court of Civil Appeal Act 1963, also common referred as the “similar purpose application” section. Unsurprisingly, the Court has pathed the way for judicial activism holding that the: “Court would therefore readily intervene, in the absence of any appropriate or adequate legal remedy, where the immediate and urgent intervention of the Court is warranted for the due administration of justice through the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction.”