Mauritius Government prioritises regulation of technology sector

Published: 27 Feb 2019
Type: Insight

Since 2017, the Government of Mauritius has demonstrated its interest and commitment to accelerating the country’s move to an age of digitally-enabled economic growth, namely by creating new opportunities for private investment and job creation.


In particular, through its FinTech Committee, the Government has identified three priority areas within the technology space for regulation in Mauritius. These include:

Initial Token Offerings (ITOs);

Custody services in relation to Digital Assets; and

Investing and Trading in Digital Assets.

Investments in Digital Assets

The Financial Services Commission (FSC) has issued a guidance note on the recognition of digital assets as an asset-class for investment by sophisticated investors. The note highlights the following;

1. Cryptocurrencies, unlike fiat currencies, are not legal tender in Mauritius. Nonetheless, the FSC acknowledges that, albeit reliant upon market demand and supply, Cryptocurrencies have “value” since they are exchangeable for other things having value, thereby showing characteristics akin to physical commodities such as grain or precious metals.

2. The FSC considers as a Digital Asset, any token, in electronic/binary form, which is representative of either the holder’s access rights to a service or ownership of an asset. The FSC considers Cryptocurrencies as being a sub-category of Digital Assets.

3. Investments in Cryptocurrencies tend to be of a high-risk nature. However, the FSC recognises that Digital Assets including Cryptocurrencies may constitute an asset-class for investment by the following:
a) Sophisticated investors;
b) Expert Investors;
c) Expert Funds;
d) Specialised Collective Investment Schemes; and
e) Professional Collective Investment Schemes.The above-mentioned terms are defined in the Securities Act or in the Securities (Collective Investment Schemes and Closed-end Funds) Regulations 2008.

4. Given the high-risk nature of investments in Digital Assets and Cryptocurrencies, the FSC considers that they may not be suitable for investment by retail investors. The FSC thus urges all prospective investors to fully ascertain the related risks prior to committing any funds for investment in Digital Assets and Cryptocurrencies. In addition, the FSC hereby informs the public and other investors that any investment in Digital Assets and Cryptocurrencies is at their own risks and that they are not protected by any statutory compensation arrangements in Mauritius.

New Licencing Regime for custodians of digital assets

From 1 March 2019 a new licencing regime for custodians of digital assets will be introduced by the FSC.

In assessing the capacity of an entity to provide custody services for Digital Assets, the approach contemplated by the FSC will focus on three core areas for this activity, namely:

1. Operational and Governance Protocols – The policies and protocols as well as operational risk management, including fraud prevention, in relation to the custody of Digital Assets;

2. Safekeeping of Digital Assets – The generation and securing of seeds and keys as well as management of addresses and wallets relating to Digital Assets. This area also extends to recovery processes regarding seeds and keys which have either been corrupted or otherwise compromised;

3. Transaction Management – The procedures for the facilitation of incoming and outgoing transactions in relation to a Digital Asset being held in custody to ensure that appropriate Know Your Client (KYC) and Customer Due Diligence (CDD) measures are applied prior to any transactions being authorised.

Regulatory Sandbox Licences

The Economic Development Board (body created following the merger between the Board of Investment, Enterprise Mauritius and the Financial Services Promotion Agency) continues to issue regulatory sandbox licences to eligible companies willing to invest in innovative projects according to an agreed set of terms and conditions for a defined period. In January 2019, five licences have been granted.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Financial-Services
8 Oct 2025

Enforcing Integrity: The UK’s Legal Arsenal Against Market Abuse

The legal concept of market abuse and the twin concept of upholding market integrity are not new as these were prevalent since the 17th century ¹. As a matter of fact, there is a belief that insider dealing was the root cause of demise of the South Sea Company in the 18th century.

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
9 Sep 2025

Dual Remedies Afforded against the Granting of Injunctions

Actis Consumer Grooming Products Ltd v Super-Max Mauritius [2025 SCJ 388]

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
27 Aug 2025

The Mauritian National Budget 2025/2026 - From abyss to prosperity: Rebuilding the bridge to future

On 05 June 2025, Dr Navinchandra Ramgoolam GCSK, FRCP, Prime Minister of Mauritius, in his capacity as Minister of Finance (Minister of Finance) tabled the National Budget for the fiscal year 2025-2026 under the theme “From Abyss to Prosperity: Rebuilding the Bridge to the Future”.

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution
18 Aug 2025

Mauritius as an Ideal Seat for Arbitration

In one of its recent determinations, the Mauritian Supreme Court re-affirmed a line of decisions which confirmed its support to arbitration, whether international or domestic. These determinations reflect its understanding of the needs of business community, characterised by a marked choice to resolve disputes through a private mechanism to allow existing business relationships to thrive.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
25 Jul 2025

Insider Dealing: A Review of the Treatment in Mauritius, EU and US Federal law

A review of the treatment in Mauritius, the United States and the European Union of the offence of insider trading confirms the contrasting approaches which these jurisdictions have adopted on the issue even though all three jurisdictions share two fundamental concerns namely, (i) the prohibition on an insider to take an unfair advantage by reason of information which he has obtained to the detriment of third parties who are unaware of such information and, (ii) the protection of the integrity of financial markets and investor confidence ¹.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
20 Jun 2025

Professional emails are personal data

Case Commentary – France, Cour de cassation, 18 June 2025, 23-19.022 Professional emails are personal data.

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
11 Jun 2025

Are our Courts tilting towards procedural flexibility?

Case Commentary: R.K.G FRUITS CO LTD v MAERSK (MAURITIUS) LIMITED 2025 SCJ 220. In a significant decision reaffirming the principle that procedural technicalities should not override substantive justice, the Court of Civil Appeal allowed an appeal overturning an interlocutory judgment of the Bankruptcy Division that had dismissed an application to set aside a statutory demand on the basis of a contested board resolution.

Appleby-Website-Technology-and-Innovation
19 Mar 2025

Is Cryptocurrency security - the Mauritian and USA perspectives?

As any of the emerging technologies, cryptocurrency has been disruptive to the market and has challenged regulators globally. Unsurprisingly, it has been commented that “a little more than a decade ago, cryptocurrencies were essentially an academic concept. The idea seemed far-fetched to most people. But that all changed in 2009 with the creation of Bitcoin …/… [today] the world’s cryptocurrency market is worth more than USD 3 trillion …/… there’s no question that crypto is here to stay, and it will undoubtedly continue to disrupt countless industries ”.

IWD Grid Capture
8 Mar 2025

International Women’s Day 2025 roundtable: Rights. Equality. Empowerment.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
28 Jan 2025

Case Commentary: Mulliez H.S.B v Telecel Group SA & Anor 2025 SCJ 31

On 22 January 2025, the full bench of the Court of Civil Appeal in the matter of Mulliez H.S.B v Telecel Group SA & Anor 2025 SCJ 31 decided on the scope of Section 6 of the Court of Civil Appeal Act 1963, also common referred as the “similar purpose application” section. Unsurprisingly, the Court has pathed the way for judicial activism holding that the: “Court would therefore readily intervene, in the absence of any appropriate or adequate legal remedy, where the immediate and urgent intervention of the Court is warranted for the due administration of justice through the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction.”