This Note explains that:

1. Security Tokens are “securities” as defined in the Securities Act 2005, in digital format;

2. When STOs are conducted in or from Mauritius, this offering will be subject to the Securities Act 2005 and to any Regulations made thereunder by the FSC, as may be applicable;

3. No Offerings of Security Tokens may be made without the FSC’s prior approval save and except in respect of offerings to the following categories of investors:

(i) Sophisticated Investors;

(ii) Expert Investors;

(iii) Expert Funds;

(iv) Professional Collective Investment Schemes;

(v) Specialised Collective Investment Schemes.

The above-mentioned terms are defined in the Securities Act or in the Securities (Collective Investment Schemes and Closed-end Funds) Regulations 2008.

4. Any person soliciting another person to enter into transactions involving Securities Tokens must hold the appropriate license under the Securities Act 2005 and must ensure compliance with the following non-exhaustive requirements:

(i) Undertaking adequate due diligence regarding the STO;

(ii) Disclosure obligations to clients regarding the STO and risks associated thereto.

5. Investors must ascertain all risks associated to Securities Tokens prior to committing to the same. Any investment in Securities Tokens is at the investor’s own risk and no compensation arrangement exists in Mauritius in relation thereto.

For further information please reach out to Malcolm, Melissa or your usual Appleby contact.

Locations

Mauritius

Services

Corporate

Sectors

Technology & Innovation

Type

Insight

Share
X.com LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
25 Jul 2025

Insider Dealing: A Review of the Treatment in Mauritius, EU and US Federal law

A review of the treatment in Mauritius, the United States and the European Union of the offence of i...

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
20 Jun 2025

Professional emails are personal data

Case Commentary – France, Cour de cassation, 18 June 2025, 23-19.022 Professional emails are pe...

Website-Code-Mauritius-1
11 Jun 2025

Are our Courts tilting towards procedural flexibility?

Case Commentary: R.K.G FRUITS CO LTD v MAERSK (MAURITIUS) LIMITED 2025 SCJ 220. In a significant ...

Appleby-Website-Technology-and-Innovation
19 Mar 2025

Is Cryptocurrency security - the Mauritian and USA perspectives?

As any of the emerging technologies, cryptocurrency has been disruptive to the market and has challe...

IWD Grid Capture
8 Mar 2025

International Women’s Day 2025 roundtable: Rights. Equality. Empowerment.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a...

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
28 Jan 2025

Case Commentary: Mulliez H.S.B v Telecel Group SA & Anor 2025 SCJ 31

On 22 January 2025, the full bench of the Court of Civil Appeal in the matter of Mulliez H.S.B v Tel...

Appleby-Website-Mauritius2
23 Dec 2024

The Mauritius Revenue Authority takes bold policy decision to treat compensation under Compromise Agreements as exempt income

In a bold move, the Mauritius Revenue Authority has decided on the 20 December 2024 to treat compens...

Appleby-Website-Mauritius4
11 Jul 2024

Our Environment Our Responsibility

The judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) in the matter of Eco-Sud and two ...

The Grand Court clarifies the ordinary rule for damages in temporary deprivation of property cases
14 May 2024

What are the tools to aid the arbitral process to combat the undesirable effects of parallel litigation?

The fundamental aspect of arbitration as an alternative dispute mechanism is that despite parties’...

MAU
29 Apr 2024

Appleby Mauritius Quarter One Newsletter 2024

As we navigate through this dynamic year, Appleby's first Mauritius newsletter of 2024 sees our team...