The lay off provisions in the Employment Act 2000 (“the Act”) allow employers to lay off employees for a period “not exceeding four months” where there are conditions of redundancy. This can be very beneficial to those businesses facing downturns or off-seasons but at the end of the four-month period, an employer has a decision to make: do they bring the employee back to work and if not, how can the situation be properly managed?

The Act states at s.32(3): “Where the lay off continues for a period which exceeds four months, it shall be deemed to be a termination for redundancy pursuant to section 30”. The first issue to unpick is whether the lay off can continue for a period which exceeds four months given that, rather contradictorily, s.32(2) of the Act states that the period of lay off cannot exceed four months. One common-sense interpretation is that the intention of the legislation is not for lay off to last more than four months, but rather if the redundancy conditions remain at the conclusion of the lay off period, and are likely to continue beyond, then this is when “it shall be deemed a termination for redundancy”.

Next to consider is whether the legislators intended for the contract of employment to be automatically terminated for redundancy if the redundancy conditions remained at the end of the lay off period, or whether the inclusion of “pursuant to section 30” means that the employer is required to conduct a process of informing and consulting in line with s.30(4) of the Act. There is no authority on this in Bermuda.

There are two main arguments that can be made. The first argument is that, because of the use of the word “deemed”, the legislation intends to treat the employee as automatically redundant at the end of four months of lay off. Arguably the legislation implies that the termination is for redundancy in such circumstances and therefore one could say that the legislation intends for an employer to treat the role as redundant. This is certainly an approach which employers are likely to be inclined to favour as it is simple and achieves the desired outcome without any procedure.

The second argument is made on the basis that employment legislation is generally designed to provide employees with a degree of protection. As such it could be said that an employer must go through the process of informing and consulting as it gives the employee the opportunity to propose measures which could be taken as an alternative to dismissal and to be made aware of other available roles. What if the employee was able to suggest a way for the company to keep his/ her role?

The first approach carries a degree of risk because, if the interpretation is incorrect, an employee could bring a claim for unfair dismissal on the basis that they were not informed nor consulted about the redundancy. The second approach is very much a ‘belts and braces’ approach and guards against any potential claims of procedural unfairness, however it does require more administrative power.

One point for cautious employers preferring the second approach is that given that s.30(4) of the Act requires the informing and consulting process to take place “not less than 14 days before giving notice”, and in light of the legislation suggesting that a period of lay off cannot exceed four months, then employers are going to want to keep a close eye on the calendar and be sure to conduct the consultation meeting not less than 14 days before the end of the lay off period.

First Published in the Bermuda Chamber of Commerce Newsletter (Chamber Insider), October 2023

Share
X.com LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
Bermuda-1024x576-1
22 May 2025

Corporate real estate acquisition in Bermuda

Corporate real estate acquisitions in Bermuda are a matter of careful balance. That is because, a...

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
22 May 2025

Long-term reinsurance and ILS are set for growth

After a record-breaking  2024, Bermuda’s life reinsurance sector is likely to expand further this...

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
15 May 2025

Bermuda: The vital role of the principal representative

Bermuda's regulatory framework requires every insurance company registered under the Insurance Act 1...

Employment-and-Immigration
30 Apr 2025

The End of the Digital Nomad Visa: How Else Can Individuals Reside in Bermuda?

As of 28 February 2025, Bermuda officially discontinued its popular “Work from Bermuda” (WFB) Ce...

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
25 Apr 2025

Compliance with Pipa for trustees

The Personal Information Protection Act 2016, the island’s data protection legislation, applies to...

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
14 Apr 2025

M&A transactions under PIPA (Bermuda)

Mergers and business acquisitions are among the many different types of business transactions that r...

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2025

Bermuda: With everything growing, all of the ILS world will rise together

It’s been an exceptionally busy and record start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, and ...

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
27 Mar 2025

Entering and Exiting Bermuda for Visa-Controlled Nationals

As it stands, with direct commercial flights to and from Bermuda only going from the United Kingdom,...

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
27 Mar 2025

How foreign companies become Bermuda companies

Bermuda, renowned as a global business hub, offers a robust legal and regulatory framework that attr...

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2025

Bridging the USD51 trillion gap: asset-intensive reinsurance in Bermuda

In this article we examine the rise and regulatory landscape of Asset-Intensive Reinsurance (AIR) in...