Whilst the Electronic Transactions Law was drafted with a degree of “future proofing” in mind, and is arguably sufficient to encompass many of the uses of technology that exist today, the certainty that the new legislation will bring is to be welcomed.

In today’s digital economy, with the growing adoption of AI and distributed ledger technology (amongst others), it is vital that Guernsey remains innovative. Given the notorious difficulties inherent in the law keeping pace with technological developments, a broadly-drafted, permissive legislative regime is vital. However, there has to be certainty in order for businesses to be confident that their use of technology and automated processes will be validated. The new legislation is intended to bring that certainty, whilst retaining mechanisms for resolving issues should “unintended consequences” flow from the actions of such electronic agents.

Electronic Agent

An “electronic agent” is defined in the Electronic Transactions Law as:

“a computer program or electronic or other automated means used independently to initiate an action or to respond in whole or in part to information or actions in electronic form or communicated by electronic means, without review or action by a natural person.”

In other words, computer code which will carry out a task or series of tasks, in response to information it receives, without further input from a human. For example, programming a computer to purchase an item online once it has scanned websites looking for the lowest price. Alternatively, paying funds to purchase goods automatically to a third party once confirmation has been received that the goods have been delivered.

Why now?

There has been a significant amount of commentary and academic legal debate about the interaction between the use of electronic agents and traditional contract law. Many jurisdictions do not have laws which address these issues, or give limited guidance. Whilst this does not prevent the use of electronic agents, it does create uncertainty.

Given the increasing reliance on technology, its growing commercial viability and its use in high-value transactions, the legal effects of using such agents have to be clear, both in order to encourage adoption of the technology and retain confidence in e-commerce more generally.

Guernsey wishes to build on its existing legislation to provide express confirmation that such transactions will be recognised, which is intended to boost confidence and enable adopters of technology solutions to utilise Guernsey as a “test bed” for their implementation and development. The proposal is also consistent with the aims of the States’ Digital Sector Strategic Framework, to develop and encourage innovation in technology and the growth of the digital sector on the island.

What does it do?

The proposals involve expressly confirming that transactions entered into by electronic agents will not be denied legal effect, validity or enforceability by virtue of them being created or delivered by electronic agents. Similarly, valid contracts may be formed between electronic agents without human intervention, or between humans and electronic agents.

There will be a rebuttable presumption that by using an electronic agent to form a contract, the person intended a binding contract to be formed. The important part there is “rebuttable”, which will enable parties to argue that “unintended consequences” (perhaps resulting from faulty coding or a malfunction in the operating system) should not bind them, should such eventualities arise.

Parties will still be at liberty to choose the law governing any contracts entered into, which will itself prove challenging given the borderless nature of a growing portion of the digital economy.

What’s next?

Draft legislation will be prepared and is likely to be subject to consultation before being finalised. Watch this space…..

Technological innovation is transforming businesses, markets and our everyday life. Appleby’s multi-disciplinary global Technology and Innovation group comprises experts from each of our 10 offices to help businesses meet the new challenges and support clients across a broad range of emerging technologies

Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
25 Nov 2021 |

Regulatory Approach to ESG across the Crown Dependencies

New requirements may require investment products to display a label reflecting their sustainability ...

5 Oct 2021 |

Notaries: Are Simple Certifications a Thing Anymore?

Notaries are primarily concerned with the authentication and certification of signatures, authority ...

30 Jul 2021 |

Fighting international fraud

First published in New Law Journal, July 2021. Appleby partners Anthony William and Jared Dann an...

Contributors: Jared Dann, Claire Corkish
20 May 2021 |

The Gender Pay Gap Debate – a response to comments on social media

As a lawyer the majority of articles we write are about a particular case or a legal issue – which...

4 May 2021 |

New Private Investment Funds in Guernsey

In December 2020, the Guernsey Financial Services Commission (Commission) published a consultation p...

Contributors: Oratile Jonas
16 Mar 2021 |

Guernsey Structures - The Cannabis Investment Conundrum

Jurisdictions around the world have adopted different positions in relation to the legality of the c...

12 Mar 2021 |

Material adverse change clauses in light of the Covid-19 pandemic

Experts from each of our key global offices provide jurisdiction specific advice and answer question...

8 Mar 2021 |

Appleby Celebrates International Women’s Day

International Women’s Day is celebrated annually in support of gender equality and equal participa...

23 Feb 2021 |

Fit and Proper in the Channel Islands – A Regulatory Enforcement Update

It is sometimes easy to forget with all that has happened over the last 12 months that there was a w...