Press reports also suggest that HSBC, Barclays and The Royal Bank of Scotland International have followed suit in sending letters to those Jersey account holders for whom they do not have sufficient Know Your Client documentation.

Whilst the number of accounts involved suggests that AML controls in the past may have been insufficiently stringent, these initiatives demonstrate that the island’s financial institutions are taking their AML responsibilities seriously.  They are also just one of a number of developments which demonstrate Jersey’s commitment to maintaining its reputation as a leading offshore financial centre.

These developments include Jersey’s excellent performance in its most recent Moneyval review in 2016 (Moneyval is a committee of the Council of Europe which assesses compliance with international anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing standards).  By contrast, Malta – an EU member – has very recently failed its initial Moneyval assessment and reports suggest that it has been given a year to put its house in order or risk the imposition of sanctions. In the past few days, the OECD has also confirmed that it is satisfied with Jersey’s newly introduced economic substance legislation, which is intended to prevent tax avoidance through the improper shifting of profits to low tax jurisdictions.

The Jersey Government is currently working closely with the US and Nigerian Governments (in efforts which I have witnessed at first hand) to return to Nigeria more than USD300 million which was looted from the country by its former President, General Abacha, and his associates. This is the culmination of a  process lasting more than ten years which has required the passing of new legislation in Jersey (the Civil Asset Recovery (International Co-operation)(Jersey) Law 2007) to facilitate the confiscation and the return of the funds.

In the same vein, the Jersey Financial Services Commission has acquired new powers to fine regulated firms or individuals up to GBP4 million for serious or recurring breaches of the code of conduct, and has recently issued its first such penalty.

Whilst there is clearly plenty more to be done in order to satisfy Jersey’s critics, there can be no doubt that the Island and its financial institutions have taken giant steps to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism, and that the picture in this area remains a positive one.

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
8 Mar 2021 |

Appleby Celebrates International Women’s Day

International Women’s Day is celebrated annually in support of gender equality and equal participa...

2 Mar 2021 |

KBR and the Serious Fraud Office – should offshore companies and corporate providers still worry about a knock at the door from the SFO?

At first sight, the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in R (on the application of KBR Inc) v D...

2 Mar 2021 |

Listing Private Equity Acquisition Debt on The International Stock Exchange

The purpose of this article is to provide a high level understanding of Appleby listing agent servic...

Contributors: Chris Smedley
24 Feb 2021 |

Fintech: advancing economies in Africa

In this article we explore the rapidly evolving African FinTech industry.

Contributors: Lebogang Maimane
23 Feb 2021 |

Fit and Proper in the Channel Islands – A Regulatory Enforcement Update

It is sometimes easy to forget with all that has happened over the last 12 months that there was a w...

4 Feb 2021 |

GBP 2million fine for contempt of Court: The Jersey Royal Court issues stark warning to litigants

The Jersey Court has shown that it continues to expect, and if necessary will demand, compliance wit...

Contributors: Amy Benest
9 Dec 2020 |

Jersey Propco structures: still a strong foundation

First Published in Jersey First for Finance, December 2020

Contributors: David Dorgan, Daniel Healy
3 Dec 2020 |

Objectively speaking – Jersey confirms its stance on contractual formation

A recent decision of the Royal Court has held that, when determining whether or not parties have con...