The recent judgement of His Honour Deemster Doyle in the case of AB v CD highlighted an area of uncertainty in Manx trust law by questioning under what circumstances would the Manx courts be willing to interfere with a trustee’s decision which has given rise to unintended consequences, including unintended tax consequences.

AB v CD

AB v CD concerned an application for an order to set aside a number of call options (Options) granted by the Defendant over the assets of eight discretionary trusts established under Manx law (Trusts). The order was applied for under the rule as established by the case of Hastings-Bass (the Hastings-Bass Rule) (also referred to as the proper deliberation rule) or, in the alternative, on the grounds of mistake. The Claimant was the settlor and primary beneficiary of the Trusts and the Defendant was the trustee.

Type

Insight

Locations

Isle of Man

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
8 Dec 2020 |

The International Comparative Legal Guide to Gambling 2021 – Isle of Man Chapter

This chapter was first published in The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Gambling 2021, by ...

Contributors: Sophie Corkish
30 Oct 2020 |

When Worlds Collide – How COVID is Connecting Technology with Natural Resources

Dating back to the beginning of 2020, the natural resources sector has been extremely active at both...

13 Aug 2020 |

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACS) make a comeback

In this global article on SPACs we revisit the basics, then look to each of our key jurisdictions fo...

20 Jul 2020 |

Listing quoted Eurobonds on The International Stock Exchange

The International Stock Exchange (TISE or the Exchange) provides recognised facilities for the listi...

Contributors: Chris Smedley
8 Jul 2020 |

Isle of Man Treasury announce new personal injury discount rate

The Isle of Man Treasury has announced that a new discount rate will be applicable to personal injur...

Contributors: Claire Corkish