Disclosure of Trust information by trustees to beneficiaries is fundamental in permitting beneficiaries to assert their right to hold trustees to account in the administration of a trust. In parallel, the EU has decided that disclosure of trust information is crucial in the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. Therefore, two questions arise about the interaction of the two regimes regarding disclosure of trust information: can a beneficiary still obtain trust information where the trustees have decided not to disclose that information, and perhaps a court has agreed with them? And are trustees required to disclose trust information to non-beneficiaries?

In the UK, a beneficiary could use a subject access request (SAR), pursuant to s7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA), to obtain disclosure against either the trustee (if resident in the UK) or, more importantly for trustees resident in the Crown Dependencies (CD trustees), legal advisors resident in the UK and holding trust information as part of their instructions. The latter was confirmed by the English Court of Appeal case of Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP. This case may have consequences for any non-UK resident trustee who instructs the services of UK lawyers.

CD trustees might instruct UK resident lawyers to advise on, for example, a transaction involving London realty. As part of those instructions, CD trustees are likely to provide the legal advisor with copies of trust documentation, including, perhaps, trustees’ minutes and other information that might not otherwise be disclosable to beneficiaries. Pursuant to the aforementioned case, that trust information held by the legal advisor could be exposed to disclosure pursuant to a SAR.

But hang on – the DPA contains a specific exemption from a SAR for legal advice and proceedings. Although this is true, and was argued by Taylor Wessing in Dawson-Damer, the Court of Appeal held that this exemption should be narrowly construed and applied to documentation that could be withheld as a matter of English law. The trust was governed by Bahamian law and the Court of Appeal rejected the argument that the exemption should extend to restrictions under foreign-law principles. The DPA does not contain an exemption mirroring applicable trust-law principles on disclosure, and the Court of Appeal made it clear that parliament would need to include such an exemption if that was the intention. In this regard, the Court of Appeal knew that the purpose of the SAR was for the beneficiary to obtain information to use in Bahamian litigation against the trustee, but held that this was not a ground to prevent compliance with the SAR. Therefore, a SAR under the DPA can circumvent well-established trust-law principles, including the disclosure of trustees’ deliberations not ordinarily disclosable, if held by the legal advisors. Consequently, ‘fishing’ SARs could be used as a litigation tactic.

To read more, click the link below.




Private Equity



Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
22 Sep 2021 |

Minute Writing Training

Trustees are under a statutory duty to keep accurate records of their trusteeship, but what does tha...

2 Sep 2021 |

Duties of Trustees

The relationship of trustees to beneficiaries is viewed as fiduciary, meaning there are certain equi...

18 Aug 2021 |

Beneficial Owners and Controllers (BOC)

The aim of BOC is to drill-down to the identification of persons who are the beneficial owners and c...

30 Jul 2021 |

Fighting international fraud

First published in New Law Journal, July 2021. Appleby partners Anthony William and Jared Dann an...

Contributors: Jared Dann, Claire Corkish
27 Jul 2021 |

Fund Finance Update – Will Jersey’s new sustainable investment disclosure requirements aid ESG financing?

This article provides an overview of ESG, the hot topic of 2020 that is carrying on full steam throu...

Contributors: Daniel Healy
22 Jul 2021 |

Listing Variable Funding Notes (VFNs) on The International Stock Exchange

This article provides a summary of Appleby listing agent services in the Channel Islands, and also o...

1 Jul 2021 |

Saunders v Vautier where the beneficial class is not closed - the debate goes on...

The rule in Saunders v Vautier is familiar territory for trust lawyers.  In the modern world it is ...

17 Jun 2021 |

Solvency Statements under Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 - Is it time to go paperless?

In April of this year, the Royal Court of Jersey considered the practicalities around the making of ...

Contributors: Kevin McQuillan
11 Jun 2021 |

“Offshore intelligence – Funds in demand” Appleby Podcast

We have recently produced a podcast focused on the Funds industry entitled “Offshore Intelligence ...

2 Jun 2021 |

Why use Jersey entities in restructurings?

As the extension of various forbearance measures and fiscal support packages continues in response t...

Contributors: Gemma Whale, Andrew Weaver