The key points of the changes are as follows:

52 weeks of combined parental leave for all parents, including surrogate parents – this replaces existing separate maternity, adoption and parental leave rights;

Time off work to attend appointments for adoptive and surrogate parents;

Specific breastfeeding rights, including breaks and workplace facilities;

A right to paid leave where pregnant and breastfeeding women are unable to work on health and safety grounds.

It will be interesting to see how these changes work in practice, certainly in the UK based on figures from the Department of Business the take-up of shared parental leave “could be as low as 2%”. Whilst Jersey is adopting a different and what it hopes will be a more straightforward system of combined leave, it is likely to take time for new parents to get used to the system and in the short-term take up will probably be low. This should hopefully go some way to reassuring employers, because although they will need to yet again update their policies and procedures, they are unlikely to be met with a wave of requests by fathers to take extended time off, especially as the right to paid time off is still limited to the mother in the first six weeks of compulsory paid leave.

Similarly, the right to paid leave in the context of pregnant and breastfeeding women, is not as wide as it might appear at first glance. This is not intended as a right to paid sickness leave for any maternity related absence, rather it covers the situation where a feature of the workplace is unsafe and the employer is not able to make adjustments to remove this risk. Where the employer becomes aware that a member of staff is pregnant they already should undertake a risk assessment, this new right really follows on from this existing duty so that if following a risk assessment adjustments cannot be made, a pregnant or breastfeeding mother does not lose out financially.

Type

Insight

Locations

Guernsey, Jersey

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
27 Sep 2022

Similar but Different

While the basic features of the trust remain, there are some notable differences in how trusts can b...

23 Feb 2022

Anonymisation of decisions: an invitation to consider this more but the unscrupulous need not apply!

The adage that ‘justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done” derives from a ...

25 Nov 2021

Regulatory Approach to ESG across the Crown Dependencies

New requirements may require investment products to display a label reflecting their sustainability ...

30 Jul 2021

Fighting international fraud

First published in New Law Journal, July 2021. Appleby partners Anthony William and Jared Dann an...

Contributors: Jared Dann, Claire Corkish
12 Mar 2021

Material adverse change clauses in light of the Covid-19 pandemic

Experts from each of our key global offices provide jurisdiction specific advice and answer question...

8 Mar 2021

Appleby Celebrates International Women’s Day

International Women’s Day is celebrated annually in support of gender equality and equal participa...

23 Feb 2021

Fit and Proper in the Channel Islands – A Regulatory Enforcement Update

It is sometimes easy to forget with all that has happened over the last 12 months that there was a w...

1 Dec 2020

Reflections from the Virtual Fund Finance Symposium

The Fund Finance Association’s Virtual Symposium took place from 16th to 20th November. Attendees ...

Contributors: Fiona Chan
27 Nov 2020

NAV Facilities: A Promising Vaccine for Funds in the Era of Covid-19?

The spotlight has been on NAV facilities and other bespoke financings as an area poised for growth, ...