The Royal Court of Jersey’s decision in Klonowska v The Chief Minister (judgment dated 21 July 2016), the only reported case concerning the Control of Housing and Work (Jersey) Law 2012 (Law), highlights the distinction that can exist under the 2012 Law between business licensing and the employment of individuals with “Registered” status. This status relates to a person who, in essence, needs permission to be employed by virtue of not having lived in Jersey for 10 years or more, not being an “essential employee” for whom a license has been granted or not having lived in Jersey for five consecutive years.

In Klonowska, an application was made to the Population Office for a business license relating to the acquisition of an undertaking and for permission to work within it as Registered staff. Owing to a recent change in the Population Office’s policy in relation to persons with Registered status owning undertakings, whilst there was no preclusion on ownership, there was no presumed right for Registered persons to work in such undertakings or to obtain permission to work in such undertakings.

Under the Law, where a business license is granted, it can specify the maximum number of individuals with Registered status who are permitted to work for the undertaking. In this case, the Population Office granted a license subject to a condition, amongst other conditions, that the undertaking is not permitted to engage any Registered staff. The reasons given for the condition included the high demands that may be placed on the island’s limited resources through providing work opportunities to persons with Registered status.

The Court paid particular attention to the term “undertaking”, taking the view that such reference (as defined at Article 23 of the Law) was to a license holder carrying on a trade, business or service performed for the public, and conditions should distinguish between license holders’ participation in running businesses and the engaging of other Registered staff. The Court drew particular attention to the fact that this application was to also participate in running the business, stating that it was counterintuitive to, on the one hand, grant a license to carry on undertakings, whilst precluding license holders from actually engaging in any work in managing, directing or controlling undertakings.

The Court therefore concluded that having a condition such as this in licenses may not, on its own, prevent license holders from working in their respective businesses. It noted that, in particular, these licenses allow the holders to carry on businesses from specified premises within Jersey and that carrying on these businesses cannot be viewed as engaging other Registered persons (i.e. a purported conceptual impossibility whereby such license holders need to engage themselves to provide themselves with their own services). The Court explained further that the term “staff” should actually be read as a reference to persons working for an organisation (i.e. other persons, aside from the business owners).

The case highlights the importance for business acquirers to consider scenarios where distinctions between business acquisition and managing/running the business may arise in the context of the Law and seek legal advice where relevant. Failure to consider these situations can lead to problems further down the line (as seen in this case).





Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
2 Sep 2021 |

Duties of Trustees

The relationship of trustees to beneficiaries is viewed as fiduciary, meaning there are certain equi...

18 Aug 2021 |

Beneficial Owners and Controllers (BOC)

The aim of BOC is to drill-down to the identification of persons who are the beneficial owners and c...

30 Jul 2021 |

Fighting international fraud

First published in New Law Journal, July 2021. Appleby partners Anthony William and Jared Dann an...

Contributors: Jared Dann, Claire Corkish
27 Jul 2021 |

Fund Finance Update – Will Jersey’s new sustainable investment disclosure requirements aid ESG financing?

This article provides an overview of ESG, the hot topic of 2020 that is carrying on full steam throu...

Contributors: Daniel Healy
22 Jul 2021 |

Listing Variable Funding Notes (VFNs) on The International Stock Exchange

This article provides a summary of Appleby listing agent services in the Channel Islands, and also o...

1 Jul 2021 |

Saunders v Vautier where the beneficial class is not closed - the debate goes on...

The rule in Saunders v Vautier is familiar territory for trust lawyers.  In the modern world it is ...

17 Jun 2021 |

Solvency Statements under Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 - Is it time to go paperless?

In April of this year, the Royal Court of Jersey considered the practicalities around the making of ...

Contributors: Kevin McQuillan
11 Jun 2021 |

“Offshore intelligence – Funds in demand” Appleby Podcast

We have recently produced a podcast focused on the Funds industry entitled “Offshore Intelligence ...

2 Jun 2021 |

Why use Jersey entities in restructurings?

As the extension of various forbearance measures and fiscal support packages continues in response t...

Contributors: Gemma Whale, Andrew Weaver
28 May 2021 |

Further updates to the JFSC’s AML Handbook

On 31 May 2021, the handbook for the prevention and detection of money laundering and the financing ...

Contributors: Gemma Whale